首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition >Comparison of three evaporation models combined to the distillation curve model for multicomponent fuel droplet evaporation
【24h】

Comparison of three evaporation models combined to the distillation curve model for multicomponent fuel droplet evaporation

机译:三种蒸发模型与蒸馏曲线模型的多组分燃料液滴蒸发比较

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this paper is to present a validation of the distillation curve (DC) model with experimental results. Along this validation, three different droplet heating and vaporization models are also compared to see how well they are able to predict the droplet change of diameter. As the DC model requires knowing the distillation curve of complex fuel, it is proposed to use a simplified distillation curve based only on the boiling range temperatures which is more easily known than the exact distillation curve of a given fuel. The simulation results with kerosene fuel show that models 1 and 2 show exactly the same droplet lifetime and temperature profiles under quiescent hot environment. However, the behavior is different when forced convection is present The simplified DC model capture the general behavior of multicomponent fuel evaporation process. Finally, an experiment was conducted with a suspended droplet of gasoline and all three models show different temperature and diameter profiles.
机译:本文的目的是通过实验结果对蒸馏曲线(DC)模型进行验证。通过此验证,还比较了三种不同的液滴加热和汽化模型,以了解它们能够如何很好地预测液滴直径的变化。由于DC模型需要了解复杂燃料的蒸馏曲线,因此建议仅根据沸程温度使用简化的蒸馏曲线,该沸腾温度比给定燃料的精确蒸馏曲线更容易知道。煤油燃料的模拟结果表明,模型1和2在静态高温环境下显示出完全相同的液滴寿命和温度曲线。但是,当存在强制对流时,行为会有所不同。简化的DC模型捕获了多组分燃油蒸发过程的一般行为。最后,使用悬浮的汽油液滴进行了实验,所有三个模型均显示出不同的温度和直径轮廓。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号