首页> 外文会议>AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition >Reynolds-Averaged Simulations of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions with Bleed
【24h】

Reynolds-Averaged Simulations of Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions with Bleed

机译:reynolds平均仿真的冲击波/边界层与流血相互作用

获取原文

摘要

Simulations based on the Reynolds-averaged "compressible" Navier-Stokes equations were performed to study the effects of four turbulence models - realizable k-ε (RKE), renormalized group k-ε (RNG), shear-stress transport (SST) model, and stress-omega full Reynolds stress (RSM) model - in predicting shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction on a flat plate with bleed into a plenum through four rows of "90-degree" bleed holes that are arranged in a staggered fashion. The SST model was also used to examine the effects of the free stream Mach number (M_∞ = 1.6, 2.0, and 2.4) and the plenum back pressure for choked and unchoked bleed. Results obtained show all four models to predict a similar "barrier" shock structure in each bleed hole. Also, all models predicted similar bleed rates (less than 4% relative difference) that compare reasonably well with experimentally measured values. However, the four models differ significantly in how they predict the flow field between the bleed holes when there is an incident shock wave. The RKE and RNG models, which utilize the one-equation model in the near-wall region, predicted velocity profiles that are much fuller than those predicted by the SST and RSM models next to the wall. As a result, the RKE and RNG models predicted relatively small shock-induced separation bubbles. For the SST and RSM models, the predicted separation bubbles were much larger and were affected by both the incident shock and by the portion of the barrier shock that extends above the fiat plate. Since the production of turbulence is delayed in the RSM model, the mixing was less, and the predicted separation bubble was the largest. On the free stream Mach number, increasing it decreases the bleed rate because higher-speed flow is harder to turn into the bleed hole so that the effective area for bleed is less. Though bleed is less with the higher M_∞, the bleed was sufficient to control shock-induced flow separation. This is because the subsonic portion of the boundary layer is thinner with higher M_∞. When there is an incident shock wave on a flat plate with bleed into a common plenum, the bleed may be unchoked upstream of the incident shock and choked downstream of it and still produce good control of flow separation.
机译:进行基于所述雷诺平均“可压缩” Navier-Stokes方程模拟研究四个湍流模型的影响 - 变现的k-ε(RKE),重整化组的k-ε(RNG),剪切应力传输(SST)模型和应力,ω-全雷诺应力(RSM)模型 - 在通过四行“90度”排放孔的被布置以交错的方式预测与泄放平板冲击波/边界层相互作用到一个气室。所述SST模型也被用于审查自由流马赫数(M_∞= 1.6,2.0和2.4)和用于阻塞和非阻塞泄放气室背压的影响。得到的结果显示所有四个模型中的每个排出孔以预测类似的“屏障”防震结构。此外,所有模式预测类似泄放速率(小于4%的相对差),该比较合理地与实验测量值。然而,这四款车型中他们是如何预测泄放孔之间的流场时,有一个事件的冲击波显著不同。所述RKE和RNG模型,其利用在近壁区的一个方程模型,预测的速度分布,其比由所述SST和RSM模型预测的下一到壁更全面。作为结果,RKE和RNG模型所预测的相对小的震动引起的分离的气泡。对于SST和RSM模型中,预测的分离的气泡是大得多并受事件影响的冲击都和由该平坦板的上方延伸的阻挡冲击的部分。自生产湍流在RSM模型被延迟,混合是更小,并且所预测的分离泡是最大的。上自由流马赫数,增加它降低了泄放速率,因为较高速度的流动更难变成泄放孔中,从而对流失的有效面积较小。虽然渗出较少具有较高M_∞,泄放足以控制休克诱导的流动分离。这是因为边界层的亚音速部分更薄具有较高M_∞。当有在平板上与放泄到共同气室的入射冲击波,泄放可以是入射激波的非壅塞上游和阻塞在其下游,并且仍然产生流分离的良好控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号