首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the International Speech Communication Association;INTERSPEECH 2010 >An Empirical Comparison of the T2, Juicer, HDecode and Sphinx3 Decoders
【24h】

An Empirical Comparison of the T2, Juicer, HDecode and Sphinx3 Decoders

机译:T2,Juicer,HDecode和Sphinx3解码器的经验比较

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we perform a cross-comparison of the T3 WFST decoder against three different speech recognition decoders on three separate tasks of variable difficulty. We show that the T3 decoder performs favorably against several established veterans in the field, including the Juicer WFST decoder, Sphinx3, and HDecode in terms of RTF versus Word Accuracy. In addition to comparing decoder performance, we evaluate both Sphinx and HTK acoustic models on a common footing inside T3, and show that the speed benefits that typically accompany the WFST approach increase with the size of the vocabulary and other input knowledge sources. In the case of T3, we also show that GPU acceleration can significantly extend these gains.
机译:在本文中,我们针对可变难度的三个独立任务,对三种不同的语音识别解码器执行了T3 WFST解码器的交叉比较。我们证明T3解码器在RTF相对于字精度方面的表现优于该领域的几位资深人士,包括Juicer WFST解码器,Sphinx3和HDecode。除了比较解码器性能之外,我们还在T3内部的相同基础上评估了Sphinx和HTK声学模型,并表明WFST方法通常带来的速度优势会随着词汇量和其他输入知识源的增加而增加。对于T3,我们还表明GPU加速可以显着扩展这些增益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号