首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting exposition of the Controlled Release Society >Intestinal Permeation Enhancement for Poorly Absorbed Drugs: Matching Mechanism of Action with Biological Assessment
【24h】

Intestinal Permeation Enhancement for Poorly Absorbed Drugs: Matching Mechanism of Action with Biological Assessment

机译:吸收不良药物的肠道渗透增强:作用与生物学评估的匹配机制

获取原文

摘要

Use of permeation enhancers for oral delivery of macromolecules has a history dating back nearly 50 years. After a lull in the late 1990s, permeation enhancers are now providing convincing human clinical efficacy and safety data with selected cargoes. While any of the most advanced enhancers in clinical development are recognized as safe for human consumption due to their presence in foodstuffs and use as excipients, this does not however necessarily mean that they are safe in oral dosage forms specifically designed to promote absorption. It is somewhat ironic that the enhancer-based platforms that appear most advanced for oral delivery are relatively simple solid-dose formulations, whose mechanism of promotion in higher non-reductionist models appears multi-faceted. At the relevant doses required for efficacy, they can have relatively non-specific effects on the epithelium in vivo. In addition, assumptions over potential toxicity of enhancers have hampered the research area despite a myriad of human data showing little evidence of bystander pathogen absorption. In fact, there is evidence that some promoters are no more damaging to the intestinal epithelium than several food substances, established drug formulations and normal bowel residents, such as bile salts. Furthermore, the intestinal epithelium has a remarkable capacity to repair superficial mucosal injury (1), which may allow at least a degree of repeat dosing. The fact that an oro-buccal formulation of insulin containing micelles and bile salt-type excipients was recently approved by the FDA for selected Type II diabetic patients (2) offers encouragement to the intestinal delivery field. It is recognized however, that there are significant differences in the challenges for regional intestinal delivery, along with a potentially higher safety bar.This presentation will review key data from my group on the medium chain fatty acid enhancer, sodium caprate (C_(10)). 1 will describe how our experiments (3) and those of others (4) using Caco-2 monolayers as well as rodent and human intestinal mucosae mounted in Ussing chambers deciphered how= the agent reversibly opens epithelial tight junctions in vitro by intracellular mechanisms at low concentrations. Next, rat intestinal instillations and perfusion data will be discussed in respect of efficacy and histopathology, along with the discovery that the concentrations required for efficacy (50-150 mM) are related in part to surfactant-like transcellular effects at that are well above the critical micellar concentration (CMC). This led us to re-examinethe received wisdom that the CMC for C_(10) was 13 mM, when we discovered that such a conclusion was highly method- and buffer-dependent. Using laser imaging, we found evidence of vesicle formation at high mM concentrations; such data suggested that specific tight junction effects that might account for delivering macromolecules in vivo could not be correct. In the rat intestinal instillation model, we showed that superficial mucosal injury induced by C_(10) was reversible within 30 minutes and that these effects were correlated with bioactive delivery — similar data to that published by Joe Robinson's lab in respect of delivering phenol red with a non-specific surfactant (5). The major difference was that C_(10) seems to reverse more quickly at both the level of damage and concomitant delivery.Finally, recent clinical data from Merrion Pharmaceuticals (Dublin, Ireland) and ISIS Pharma (Carlsbad, CA) based on enteric coated solid-dose formulations containing C_(10) improved oral absorption of bisphosphonates and anti-sense oligonucleotides, respectively. This suggests that reasonable oral bioavailability with acceptable safety profiles may eventually be attained in man for selected bioactives (3).
机译:渗透增强剂用于大分子口服给药的历史可追溯到近50年。在1990年代后期停滞后,渗透促进剂现在可以提供令人信服的人类临床疗效和精选货物的安全性数据。尽管由于它们在食品中的存在和作为赋形剂的使用,临床开发中任何最先进的增强剂都被认为对人类食用是安全的,但是这并不一定意味着它们在专门设计用于促进吸收的口服剂型中是安全的。具有讽刺意味的是,对于口服给药而言,最先进的基于增强剂的平台是相对简单的固体剂型,其在较高的非还原剂模型中的促进机制似乎是多方面的。在达到功效所需的相关剂量下,它们在体内对上皮细胞可能具有相对非特异性的作用。此外,尽管有大量的人类数据显示没有旁观者病原体吸收的证据,但是关于增强剂潜在毒性的假设阻碍了研究领域的发展。实际上,有证据表明,某些促进剂对肠道上皮的损害不比几种食品,确定的药物制剂和正常的肠道居民(如胆汁盐)损害更大。此外,肠上皮具有显着的修复浅表粘膜损伤的能力(1),这可能至少允许一定程度的重复给药。 FDA最近批准了针对某些II型糖尿病患者的含胶束和胆汁盐型赋形剂的口颊颊胰岛素制剂(2),这一事实为肠道输送领域提供了鼓励。然而,已经认识到,区域肠递送的挑战存在显着差异,同时安全栅可能更高。 本演讲将回顾我小组关于中链脂肪酸增强剂癸酸钠(C_(10))的关键数据。图1将描述我们的实验(3)和其他实验(4),是使用Caco-2单层以及安装在Ussing室中的啮齿动物和人肠道粘膜如何解密的,该试剂如何通过低细胞内机制在体外可逆地打开上皮紧密连接浓度。接下来,将就功效和组织病理学方面讨论大鼠肠道滴注和灌注数据,并发现功效所需的浓度(50-150 mM)部分与表面活性剂样跨细胞作用有关,该浓度远高于表面活性剂样的跨细胞作用。临界胶束浓度(CMC)。这导致我们重新审视 我们发现C_(10)的CMC为13 mM,这是我们所公认的,当我们发现这样的结论高度依赖于方法和缓冲区时。使用激光成像,我们发现了在高mM浓度下囊泡形成的证据。这样的数据表明,可能导致体内大分子递送的特定紧密连接效应是不正确的。在大鼠肠道滴注模型中,我们显示了C_(10)引起的浅表黏膜损伤在30分钟内是可逆的,并且这些作用与生物活性传递相关-与乔·鲁宾逊实验室发表的关于酚红传递的相似数据相似。非特异性表面活性剂(5)。主要区别在于,C_(10)在损坏级别和伴随的交付级别上似乎更快地反转。 最后,来自Merrion制药公司(爱尔兰都柏林)和ISIS Pharma公司(加利福尼亚州卡尔斯巴德)的最新临床数据基于含C_(10)的肠溶衣固体剂量制剂,分别改善了双膦酸酯和反义寡核苷酸的口服吸收。这表明对于选定的生物活性物质,最终可以在人体内获得具有可接受安全性的合理口服生物利用度(3)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号