首页> 外文会议>Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) >Analysis of TCP-Reno and TCP-Vegas over AOMDV routing protocol for mobile ad hoc network
【24h】

Analysis of TCP-Reno and TCP-Vegas over AOMDV routing protocol for mobile ad hoc network

机译:用于移动自组网的AOMDV路由协议上的TCP-Reno和TCP-Vegas分析

获取原文

摘要

A mobile ad hoc network eliminates the complexity of infrastructure configuration and allows wireless devices to communicate with each other on the fly. It does not rely on a base station to coordinate the flow of messages in the network. A primary challenge is to provide each device to maintain the information to properly route traffics using a routing protocol and conveying data packets efficiently using a transport protocol. Many routing protocols and transport protocols are currently being developed to handle the wireless environment efficiently. In this paper, we investigate the performance differences of TCP-Reno and TCP-Vegas utilizing an AOMDV routing protocol. Although TCP-Vegas provides a better throughput than TCP-Reno in a static environment, it suffers performance degradation in a mobile environment, where packet loss rate, throughput, normalized routing load and average delay are measured as performance metrics, as well as discussed by describing strengths and weaknesses of TCP-Reno and TCP-Vegas.
机译:移动自组织网络消除了基础架构配置的复杂性,并允许无线设备即时进行通信。它不依赖基站来协调网络中的消息流。一个主要的挑战是为每个设备提供维护信息,以使用路由协议正确路由流量,并使用传输协议有效地传输数据包。当前正在开发许多路由协议和传输协议以有效地处理无线环境。在本文中,我们研究了使用AOMDV路由协议的TCP-Reno和TCP-Vegas的性能差异。尽管TCP-Vegas在静态环境中提供的吞吐量比TCP-Reno更好,但在移动环境中性能会下降,在移动环境中,数据包丢失率,吞吐量,归一化路由负载和平均延迟均作为性能指标进行了测量,并在2000年进行了讨论。描述TCP-Reno和TCP-Vegas的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号