首页> 外文会议>Annual conference on explosives and blasting technique;Conference on explosives and blasting technique >Influence of distance in the effective use of electronic detonators to control blast induced ground vibrations
【24h】

Influence of distance in the effective use of electronic detonators to control blast induced ground vibrations

机译:距离对有效使用电子雷管控制爆炸引起的地面振动的影响

获取原文

摘要

The use of electronic detonators to control blast vibrations has been previously established by many authors. This is performed by determining the optimum delay period between the blast holes for a particular pattern that can accurately control the firing frequency of the blast, which in turn has a direct bearing on the frequency composition of the ground vibrations recorded at a particular location. This was established by Pedgen, Birch, Hosein & Farnfield (2006) whereby like-for-like comparison tests between non-electric and electronic blasts were carried out in a limestone quarry in northern England. They demonstrated that resulting peak particle velocity values recorded at near and mid-field distances were primarily a product of the firing frequency of the electronically initiated blasts.However, it was thought that distance may also be another controlling factor in the deployment of electronic donators. The logic being that, all frequencies dissipate as the distance increases from any given blast to an observation point; however the controllable frequencies being of the order of 15 to 200 Hertz will attenuate in a shorter distance than 1 to 8 Hertz. This is also compounded by the fact that the actual blast vibration consists of a number of different wave types. The two main wave types are body waves and surface waves. These in turn also attenuate at different rates due to geometric spreading; the surface wave in proportion to the reciprocal of the distance (1/r) and the body wave in proportion to the reciprocal of the square of the distance (1/r~2).A series of like-for-like comparison tests between non-electric and electronic blasts were carried out in a chalk quarry where the recording distances covered was over 1km. It was found that the controllable frequencies appeared to be contained within the body waves produced by the blast. However once the body waves have dissipate, the surface wave was found to be still present and (due to its low frequency content and slower propagation velocities) the vibration travelled great distances from the blast. The analysis indicated that when plotting "Scaled Distance" verses the Peak Particle Velocity, there appeared to be two separate sections to the graph. At close distances the firing frequencies were found to present and thus the actual PPV levels could be modified. However at far distance these specific frequencies no longer dominated the vibration trace and thus it was no longer possible to modify the PPV levels produced by the blast.
机译:许多作者先前已经确立了使用电子雷管来控制爆炸振动。这是通过确定喷砂孔之间特定模式的最佳延迟时间来执行的,该最佳延迟时间可以精确控制喷砂的触发频率,进而直接影响记录在特定位置的地面振动的频率成分。这是由Pedgen,Birch,Hosein和Farnfield(2006)建立的,在英格兰北部的石灰石采石场中进行了非电和电子爆炸之间的对比试验。他们证明了在近场和中场距离处记录的峰值粒子速度值主要是电子爆炸的发射频率的乘积。 但是,人们认为距离可能也是电子捐赠者部署中的另一个控制因素。逻辑是,所有频率随着从任何给定爆炸到观察点的距离的增加而消散。但是,可控制的频率在15到200赫兹的数量级将在比1到8赫兹更短的距离内衰减。实际的爆炸振动由许多不同的波形组成,这一事实也使情况更加复杂。两种主要的波类型是体波和面波。这些又由于几何扩展而以不同的速率衰减。表面波与距离(1 / r)的倒数成正比,体波与距离(1 / r〜2)的平方的倒数成正比。 在白垩采石场进行了一系列非电和电子爆炸之间的类似比较测试,记录距离超过1公里。已经发现,可控频率似乎包含在爆炸产生的体波中。但是,一旦体波消散,便发现表面波仍然存在,并且(由于其低频成分和较慢的传播速度)振动距离爆炸波很远。分析表明,绘制“比例距离”与峰值粒子速度时,该图似乎有两个单独的部分。在近距离处发现点火频率,因此可以修改实际的PPV水平。但是,在很远的距离上,这些特定频率不再主导振动轨迹,因此不再可能修改爆炸产生的PPV水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号