首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting;HFES 2009 >Analysis of Subjective Body Discomfort Ratings during Simulated Prolonged Driving Tasks: What Measures are most Effective?
【24h】

Analysis of Subjective Body Discomfort Ratings during Simulated Prolonged Driving Tasks: What Measures are most Effective?

机译:在模拟的长时间驾驶任务中对主观身体不适等级的分析:哪些措施最有效?

获取原文

摘要

Subjective discomfort ratings are a common assessment technique in human factors and ergonomics, and there exist a number of different methods for analyzing ratings (e.g., mean, median, maximum rating, etc.). The objective of this research was to evaluate multiple methods for analyzing body discomfort ratings. Perceived discomfort of eight participants was measured across ten body parts (buttock, left buttock, right buttock, lower back, upper back, neck, shoulder, eye, thigh and whole body) during 2-hour simulated driving tasks at 3 backrest angles (105°, 120°, 135°). Discomfort ratings were collected every 15 minutes using a modified Borg CR- scale. The time weighted discomfort (TWD) average of was found to be more sensitive to backrest angle changes than other measures considered. In addition, factor analysis revealed different methods provided different groupings of body parts, and the method selected for analyzing subjective discomfort ratings should be selected based on the objective of the study.
机译:主观不适等级是人为因素和人体工程学中常用的评估技术,并且存在许多不同的分析等级的方法(例如,平均值,中位数,最大等级等)。这项研究的目的是评估分析身体不适等级的多种方法。在2个小时的模拟驾驶任务中,以3个靠背角度(105),在十个身体部位(臀部,左臀部,右臀部,下背部,上背部,颈部,肩膀,眼睛,大腿和整个身体)测量了八名参与者的感觉不适。 °,120°,135°)。使用改良的Borg CR量表每15分钟收集一次不适等级。发现时间加权平均不适感(TWD)对靠背角度的变化比其他考虑的措施更为敏感。此外,因素分析显示,不同的方法提供了不同的身体部位分组,应根据研究目的选择用于分析主观不适等级的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号