首页> 外文会议>IAEE international conference >Do Iran’s Buy-Back Service Contracts Lead to Optimal Production? The Case of Soroosh and Nowrooz1
【24h】

Do Iran’s Buy-Back Service Contracts Lead to Optimal Production? The Case of Soroosh and Nowrooz1

机译:伊朗的回购服务合同是否导致最佳生产? soroosh和nowrooz1的情况

获取原文

摘要

We model the dynamically optimal oil production on Iran’s offshore Soroosh and Nowrooz fields, which have been developed by Shell Exploration through a buy-back service contract. In particular, we examine the National Iranian Oil Company’s (NIOC) actual and contractual oil production behavior and compare it to the production profile that would have been optimal under the conditions of the contract. We find that the contract’s production profile is different from optimal production profile for most discount rates, and that the NIOC’s actual behavior is inefficient– its production rates have not maximized profits. Because the NIOC’s objective is purported to be maximizing cumulative production instead of the present discounted value of the entire stream of profits, we also compare the NIOC’s behavior to the production profile that would maximize cumulative production. We find that even though what the contract dictates comes close to maximizing cumulative production, the NIOC has not been achieving its own objective of maximizing cumulative production.
机译:我们模拟了伊朗海上索洛霍索和俄罗斯州的动态最佳石油生产,这是通过回购服务合同开发的由壳牌勘探开发的。特别是,我们审查了国家伊朗石油公司(NIOC)实际和合同石油生产行为,并将其与合同条件下最佳的生产档案进行比较。我们发现合同的生产型材与最佳生产型材有关的是大多数折扣率不同,但NIOC的实际行为效率低下 - 其生产率没有最大化的利润。因为NIOC的目标被声称最大化累积生产而不是整个利润流的目前折扣价值,我们还将NIOC的行为与最大化累积生产最大化的生产型材进行比较。我们发现即使合同决定的累计累计产量最为接近,NIOC还没有实现其自身目标,最大限度地提高累积生产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号