首页> 外文会议>Wuhan international conference on e-business >Analysis on the First Anti-monopoly Case about Search Engine of China--also on the Legal Risk of Search Engines
【24h】

Analysis on the First Anti-monopoly Case about Search Engine of China--also on the Legal Risk of Search Engines

机译:关于中国搜索引擎的第一次反垄断案分析 - 也就搜索引擎的法律风险

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

All Information Service Co., Ltd. of Tangshan v. Baidu Company is paid much attention to and called the first anti-monopoly case in the networking field in China. The hearing took nearly one year and the case was decided on December 18, 2009. The case is interesting and involved with a new question of whether shield acts of search engines are one kind of monopoly and under what circumstances they may be. In deciding similar cases, there are several factors to consider, such as the identification of a dominant market position, the reason, purpose and effect of shield act.
机译:唐山七的所有信息服务有限公司。百度公司在中国网络领域的关注和称为第一个反垄断案件。听证会花了近一年,案件于2009年12月18日决定。该案有趣,并参与了盾牌的盾牌行为是否是一种垄断,在什么情况下他们可能是在什么情况下。在决定类似的情况下,有几个因素需要考虑,例如识别主要的市场立场,原因,目的和效果的盾构法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号