首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting;HFES 2008 >Interventions for Overhead Drilling in Construction
【24h】

Interventions for Overhead Drilling in Construction

机译:施工中的架空钻进干预

获取原文

摘要

Drilling into concrete or metal ceilings is a strenuous task that construction workers perform to hang ductwork, piping, and electrical equipment. The task can be associated with pain and disorders at the wrist, forearm, shoulder, neck and back due to the high forces and awkward postures applied during drilling. Previously we described field usability testing of a foot lever and an inverted drill press intervention device compared to the usual method for overhead drilling. Both interventions were rated as inferior to the usual method on setup time and mobility. For this study we used the inverted drill press design but tested 3 different wheeled bases. Construction workers (N=16) evaluated usability and upper body fatigue after using the 3 devices and the usual method in commercial construction settings. Across almost all usability measures the usual method received the poorest ratings and was associated with the greatest level of regional upper body fatigue. Overall, the wheeled 'Collar Base' intervention received the best usability ratings. The study demonstrates that several rounds of field testing may be necessary to identify health and safety interventions that both reduce musculoskeletal risk and are acceptable to workers.
机译:钻入混凝土或金属天花板是建筑工人用来悬挂管道,管道和电气设备的艰巨任务。由于在钻孔过程中施加了很大的力和笨拙的姿势,因此该任务可能与腕部,前臂,肩膀,颈部和背部的疼痛和不适相关。先前,我们描述了脚架和倒置钻床干预装置与架空钻进的常规方法相比的现场可用性测试。两种干预措施在设置时间和活动性上均逊于通常的方法。在本研究中,我们使用了倒置钻床设计,但测试了3种不同的带轮底座。 N = 16的建筑工人在商业建筑环境中使用这3种设备和常用方法后评估了可用性和上身疲劳。几乎所有可用性指标中,通常的方法评分最低,并且与区域上半身疲劳程度最高相关。总体而言,轮式“ Collar Base”干预获得了最佳可用性评级。该研究表明,可能需要进行几轮现场测试,以识别既可以降低肌肉骨骼疾病风险又可以为工人所接受的健康和安全干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号