首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting;HFES 2008 >Analysing Care Home Medication Errors: A Comparison of The London Protocol and Work Domain Analysis
【24h】

Analysing Care Home Medication Errors: A Comparison of The London Protocol and Work Domain Analysis

机译:分析养老院用药错误:伦敦协议和工作域分析的比较

获取原文

摘要

Although methods for investigating safety in complex systems have been widely applied, few studies have made explicit comparisons of two or more methods used to study one system problem. This paper presents a comparison of two methods that were used to analyse medication errors identified in UK care homes namely, The London Protocol and Work Domain Analysis (WDA). The London Protocol is based on an organisational accident causation model and WDA is the first phase of analysis in Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) that models work domain constraints. Nine medication administration errors identified in seven care homes involving thirty-one residents were analysed. The analyses resulted in the identification of contributory factors to medication errors and changes that would improve system safety. The London Protocol was comparatively easier to use and required less time than the WDA. In The London Protocol, contributory factors were identified from a context-free list of error contributory conditions. From the identified error contributory factors, recommendations to improve system safety were made. However, it was difficult to relate these recommendations to the wider context of the system being studied. The WDA used a contextual model of the care home medication system in the form of an abstraction hierarchy (AH) to analyse errors. Factors contributing to medication errors were specific to the work domain and the resultant recommendations had broad applications, extending beyond the context of the specific errors analysed and were relevant to the whole system. The London Protocol would be a suitable analysis tool if the aim of the analysis was to generate short-term solutions in a short time and with limited financial resources. To make a long-term impact on system safety, the WDA is a useful tool. The AH can be used to analyse the current system, evaluate recommendations for system improvement, design interventions, implement strategies and used throughout the system's life cycle.
机译:尽管研究复杂系统安全性的方法已得到广泛应用,但很少有研究对用于研究一个系统问题的两种或更多种方法进行了明确的比较。本文介绍了两种用于分析在英国护理院中识别出的用药错误的方法,即伦敦协议和工作域分析(WDA)。伦敦议定书基于组织事故因果模型,WDA是认知工作分析(CWA)中分析工作领域约束的第一阶段。分析了涉及31个居民的7个疗养院中发现的9个药物管理错误。分析结果确定了导致药物错误和变更的因素,这些因素将改善系统安全性。与《世界发展议程》相比,《伦敦议定书》相对容易使用且所需时间更少。在《伦敦议定书》中,从无上下文的错误贡献条件列表中确定了贡献因素。从确定的错误起因中,提出了改善系统安全性的建议。但是,很难将这些建议与正在研究的系统的更广泛的背景联系起来。 WDA使用抽象层次结构(AH)形式的养老院用药系统的上下文模型来分析错误。导致用药错误的因素是特定于工作领域的,所产生的建议具有广泛的应用范围,超出了所分析的特定错误的范围,并且与整个系统相关。如果分析的目的是在短时间内以有限的财政资源产生短期解决方案,则《伦敦议定书》将是一种合适的分析工具。为了对系统安全产生长期影响,WDA是一个有用的工具。 AH可用于分析当前系统,评估系统改进建议,设计干预措施,实施策略并在系统的整个生命周期中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号