首页> 外文会议>International conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering;OMAE2008 >COMPARATIVE TEST RESEARCH ON DIFFERENT TYPE ENERGY-SAVING PUMPING UNIT
【24h】

COMPARATIVE TEST RESEARCH ON DIFFERENT TYPE ENERGY-SAVING PUMPING UNIT

机译:不同类型节能抽油机的对比试验研究

获取原文

摘要

Beam pumping unit is the uppermost artificial lifting equipment in the oilfield exploitation. In order to reduce its energy consumption and to cut down the oil production costs, many manufacturers have developed a lot of types of the energy-saving pumping unit. With different energy-saving principle, the energy-saving effects are quite different. It is becoming very important how to justly and reasonably evaluate the energy-saving effect of a pumping unit. Hydrodynamic simulated experiment well is used to compare the energy-saving effects of four types of pumping units. In the process of the experiments, water is taken as the medium, offset pumping unit is as the reference body, system efficiency and electricity-saving ratio is as the evaluating goal and all the experiments are executed at the same condition. The relative curves of the lifting height with the system efficiency and the electricity-saving ratio are drawn for the four types of the pumping units. Testing results indicate that the double horse-head pumping unit has the best effect, and then the compound-balanced pumping unit with downward beam balance weight. According to the comparative results, it is put forward the pumping unit selecting suggestions.
机译:梁式抽油机是油田开发中最重要的人工举升设备。为了减少其能源消耗并降低石油生产成本,许多制造商已经开发出许多类型的节能抽油机。节能原理不同,节能效果也大不相同。如何公正,合理地评估抽油机的节能效果已变得非常重要。水动力模拟实验井用于比较四种抽油机的节能效果。在实验过程中,以水为介质,以抽油机为基准,以系统效率和节电率为评价目标,所有实验均在相同条件下进行。绘制了四种抽油机的提升高度与系统效率和节电率的相对曲线。试验结果表明,双马头抽油机效果最好,其次是平衡重向下的复合平衡抽油机。根据比较结果,提出抽油机选型建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号