首页> 外文会议>GeoCongress 2008 >Evaluation of Axial Load Capacity of Driven Piles in Soft Soils using CPT and Static Analysis Methods
【24h】

Evaluation of Axial Load Capacity of Driven Piles in Soft Soils using CPT and Static Analysis Methods

机译:基于CPT和静力分析方法的软土中打入桩轴向承载力评估。

获取原文

摘要

This paper presents the comparison of axial load capacity of friction piles driven into soft Louisiana soils predicted using different CPT methods and static analysis. Thirty square Precast-Prestressed-Concrete (PPC) piles were investigated in this study. Since Louisiana soils are mainly consists of clay and silty clay deposits, the side friction (Q_s) dominates the total ultimate bearing capacity (Q_(ult)) compared to the end bearing capacity (Q_b). The axial capacities of the investigated piles were predicted using three direct CPT methods: Schmertmann method, Bustamante and Gianeselli (LCPC) method, and De Ruiter and Beringen method. The static analysis was also conducted to predict the ultimate bearing capacities of selected piles using a-method and Nordlund method. The predicted bearing capacities were compared with the measured bearing capacities from static load tests at field. Davisson interpretation criterion was used to determine the measured ultimate bearing capacity of the investigated piles. The analysis shows that the average method is the preferred method when CPT pile capacity is used.
机译:本文介绍了使用不同的CPT方法和静力分析预测的打入路易斯安那软土地上的摩擦桩的轴向承载能力的比较。在这项研究中,研究了30平方预制预应力混凝土(PPC)桩。由于路易斯安那州的土壤主要由粘土和粉质粘土沉积物组成,因此与最终承载力(Q_b)相比,侧向摩擦力(Q_s)主导了总极限承载力(Q_(ult))。使用三种直接CPT方法预测了被研究桩的轴向承载力:Schmertmann方法,Bustamante和Gianeselli(LCPC)方法以及De Ruiter和Beringen方法。还使用a方法和Nordlund方法进行了静态分析,以预测所选桩的极限承载力。将预测的承载能力与现场静载荷测试中测得的承载能力进行了比较。戴维森解释标准被用来确定所测得桩的极限承载力。分析表明,当采用CPT桩承载力时,平均法是首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号