This paper describes some unusual patterns that emerged from a statistical analysis of the 1988 Advanced Placement Exam in Computer Science. Most multiple-choice questions on the exam had few significant correlations with other parts of the exam. But a small set of five questions had a nontrivial correlation with many parts of the test. One question in particular demonstrated such correlations. It asked about the effect of the assignment statement "b := (b = false)" for a boolean variable b. One interpretation of this data is that these questions are testing general programming aptitude. The paper presents the analysis along with a discussion of the possible implications.
本文介绍了1988年计算机科学高级进阶考试的统计分析中出现的一些异常模式。考试中的大多数多项选择题与考试的其他部分之间没有显着的相关性。但是一小部分的五个问题与测试的许多部分都具有非平凡的相关性。特别是一个问题证明了这种相关性。它询问了赋值语句“ b:=(b = false)”对布尔变量b的影响。对此数据的一种解释是,这些问题正在测试一般的编程能力。本文介绍了分析结果,并讨论了可能的影响。 P>
机译:假阳性乳房X线摄影差异是一个谜
机译:神秘男子可以帮助减少对儿童证人的错误识别:来自视频节目单的证据
机译:揭开假名证明之谜
机译:关于神秘购物者的话是如此神秘:了解神秘购物者的资格和选择
机译:东川德也“饭后之谜”:当代日本神秘小说中不寻常的侦探。
机译:秘鲁亚马逊地区的神秘大猫:形态计量学解决了密码学的奥秘
机译:神秘男子可以帮助减少对儿童证人的错误识别:来自视频节目单的证据