首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >ASSESSING DAILY STRESS WITH THE SHORT STRESS STATE QUESTIONNAIRE (SSSQ): RELATIONSHIPS WITH COGNITIVE SLIPS-FAILURES
【24h】

ASSESSING DAILY STRESS WITH THE SHORT STRESS STATE QUESTIONNAIRE (SSSQ): RELATIONSHIPS WITH COGNITIVE SLIPS-FAILURES

机译:用短应力状态问卷(SSSQ)评估每日应力:与认知滑移-失败的关系

获取原文

摘要

Stress is an important aspect of operational settings. This article presents a study providing further psychometric and validation evidence of a short multidimensional self-report measure of stress state, the Short Stress State Questionnaire (SSSQ; Helton, 2004) based on the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ; Matthews et al, 1999, 2002). Participants filled out the SSSQ twice daily for 70 days, once in the morning and once at night. They also reported daily cognitive slips-failures. Chain-P Factor Analyses of the individual items for both pre and post assessments were conducted and the relationships between the SSSQ factors and daily self-reported cognitive slips-failures were examined. The factor analyses, as previously indicated by Helton (2004), differentiated three aspects of subjective stress: Task Engagement, Distress, and Worry. Daily post-Distress and post-Worry correlated moderately with cognitive slips. The 24-item SSSQ appears to be a reliable measure of daily stress state, potentially useful in naturalistic studies.
机译:压力是操作设置的重要方面。本文提出了一项研究,该研究为基于简短的多维自我报告的压力状态测量提供了进一步的心理计量学和验证证据,即基于邓迪压力状态调查表(DSSQ; Matthews等,1999)的短期压力状态调查表(SSSQ; Helton,2004)。 ,2002)。参与者每天两次填写SSSQ,共70天,一次是早晨,一次是晚上。他们还报告了每天的认知滑倒失败。进行了评估前后各个项目的Chain-P因子分析,并检验了SSSQ因子与日常自我报告的认知滑倒失败之间的关系。正如Helton(2004)先前指出的那样,因素分析将主观压力的三个方面进行了区分:任务投入,苦恼和忧虑。每天的困扰后和忧虑后与认知失误有中等程度的相关性。 24项SSSQ似乎是衡量日常压力状态的可靠方法,可能在自然主义研究中很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号