首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference >Comparison of QoS performance between IPv6 QoS management model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS models
【24h】

Comparison of QoS performance between IPv6 QoS management model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS models

机译:IPv6 QoS管理模型与IntServ和DiffServ QoS模型之间的QoS性能比较

获取原文

摘要

An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.
机译:越来越多的新兴Internet应用程序需要比当前Internet提供的尽力而为的服务质量(QoS)更好的服务。 IP语音(VoIP),视频点播(VoD)和电子商务等应用程序需要端到端的QoS保证,这些保证由吞吐量,延迟和丢失率来定义E. Kumsierek et al。,(2002)。但是,这些服务的QoS保证要求添加QoS算法,以执行许多资源管理功能,例如准入控制,资源预留和流量监视。这些功能会大大增加复杂性并影响网络的可伸缩性。在本文中,针对QoS保证要求,比较了三种QoS方案:集成服务(IntServ)P.P White(1997),区分服务(DiffServ)S.Balck等人(1998)和IPv6 QoS管理。此外,针对它们中的每一个都讨论了可伸缩性和复杂性问题。 IPv6 QoS管理模型在仿真过程中表现良好。实施时,它也很简单且可扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号