首页> 外文会议>International system safety conference >Comparing Software Safety Engineering with Software Integrity Methods and TechniquesThe Implications to Future Department of Defense Acquisitions
【24h】

Comparing Software Safety Engineering with Software Integrity Methods and TechniquesThe Implications to Future Department of Defense Acquisitions

机译:将软件安全工程与软件完整性方法和技术进行比较对未来国防部采购的启示

获取原文

摘要

The design and development of safety-critical, software-intensive systems within the US Department of Defense(DoD) has relied on the implementation of software safety engineering and management techniques for the lastseveral decades. In this same period of time other government agencies and commercial entities focused onmandates to help develop highly predictable and “safe” software in applications where the consequence of failure iseither unacceptable or a high-risk liability. While most developers of safety-critical software recognized the need orexperienced the contractual mandate to develop safe software, the techniques and methods to accomplish thisobjective were in many instances quite different. One group focused on “software safety” techniques while othersfocused on “Software Assurance and Software Integrity” methods. When analyzed and assessed, these differencesare not mutually exclusive, in fact, they very complementary. Future DoD software developments in safety-criticalsystems must integrate software safety engineering with software assurance and integrity methods. The end resultwill be safer systems.
机译:美国国防部内部对安全性要求高,软件密集型系统的设计和开发 (DoD)在过去的最后一刻依赖于软件安全工程和管理技术的实施 几十年。在同一时期内,其他政府机构和商业实体也将重点放在 授权在故障后果严重的应用程序中开发高度可预测的“安全”软件 要么是不可接受的,要么是高风险的责任。尽管大多数安全关键型软件开发人员都意识到了这一需求或 经历了开发安全软件的合同授权,实现此目的的技术和方法 在很多情况下,目标是完全不同的。一组关注“软件安全”技术,而另一组关注 侧重于“软件保障和软件完整性”方法。经过分析和评估,这些差异 不是互斥的,实际上它们是非常互补的。未来DoD软件在安全关键方面的发展 系统必须将软件安全工程与软件保证和完整性方法集成在一起。最终结果 将是更安全的系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号