首页> 外文会议>International conference on remediation of contaminated sediments >Planning for Cap and Habitat Restoration Material Placement, Verification, and Long-Term Monitoring
【24h】

Planning for Cap and Habitat Restoration Material Placement, Verification, and Long-Term Monitoring

机译:规划CAP和栖息地恢复材料展示,验证和长期监测

获取原文

摘要

Background/Objectives. Consistent with technical guidance from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, many sediment remediation projects involve hybrid remedies including dredging, capping, backfilling, and habitat restoration. Sediment caps may be placed as the primary remedy or following dredging to obtain a desired grade and/or contain residual contaminated sediments. Backfilling and habitat restoration often entail the placement of materials selected to accelerate natural recovery or promote targeted habitat species. Experience from a growing body of completed projects involving capping and backfill placement indicates that it is critical during the project planning and bidding stages to estimate the anticipated quantity of capping materials that will be necessary to achieve the project objectives. In addition, serious consideration must be given to methods that will be used to verify cap construction and monitor the caps over the long term based on the capping materials and site conditions. Approach/Activities. From a simplistic standpoint, the quantity (volume) of capping or habitat restoration materials can be estimated based on the area and thickness of planned placement. However, actual volumes required to achieve those dimensions will be larger than this theoretical “neatline” and will depend on a number of factors including but not limited to: 1.Project and contractual requirements 2.Over-placement payment allowances (and resulting buildup of cap) 3.Cap side slopes (i.e., losses associated with “runout”) 4.Losses associated with materials handling, transport, and placement 5.Uniformity of placement across target area(s) 6.Material type and gradation 7.Loss to water column via suspension and transport 8.Mixing with underlying sediment 9.Subgrade settlement Several of these factors also govern the selection of the appropriate method(s) to accurately verify the completion of construction and to monitor the caps into the future. It is critical that these methods be selected based on the site conditions and specifics of the cap to facilitate accurate post-cap physical and chemical monitoring.
机译:背景/目标。符合来自美国工程师和美国环境保护局的技术指导,许多沉积物修复项目涉及混合补救措施,包括疏浚,封顶,回填和栖息地恢复。沉积物盖可以作为初级补救液或疏浚以获得所需的等级和/或含有残留的污染沉积物。回填和栖息地恢复往往需要选择所选材料以加速自然恢复或促进目标栖息地物种。来自涉及封盖和回填放置的成长项目的经验表明,在项目规划和竞标阶段至关重要,以估算实现项目目标所需的预期封盖材料的预期数量。此外,必须认真考虑将用于验证盖帽结构并根据封盖材料和现场条件通过长期监控盖子的方法。方法/活动。从简单的角度来看,可以基于计划放置的面积和厚度估计封盖或栖息地修复材料的数量(体积)。然而,实现这些维度所需的实际卷将大于这个理论的“Neatline”,并取决于许多因素,包括但不限于:1.Project和合同要求2.在放置支付津贴(以及产生的积累) CAP)3.CAP侧倾斜面(即与“跳动”相关的损失)4.与材料处理,运输和放置相关的损耗。在目标区域的位置和放置的均匀性。材料类型和渐变7.LOSS到通过悬浮和运输的水柱8.具有底层沉积物的混合9.拟合沉降几个这些因素也可以控制适当的方法,以准确验证建设的完成并将帽子监控到未来。重要的是,这些方法是根据网站条件和帽的细节选择的,以便于准确的后帽物理和化学监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号