首页> 外文会议>International conference on remediation of contaminated sediments >Terrestrial or Aquatic Habitat? How to Determine Whether Soil or Sediment Criteria Should Be Applied in Wetlands
【24h】

Terrestrial or Aquatic Habitat? How to Determine Whether Soil or Sediment Criteria Should Be Applied in Wetlands

机译:陆地或水生栖息地?如何确定土壤或沉积物标准应适用于湿地

获取原文

摘要

Background/Objectives. Ecological risk assessments involve comparing a calculated dose to appropriate criterion for a particular exposure scenario. This criterion is selected for its relevance to the species of concern and the exposure pathway. We propose basing the selection of a relevant criterion on the nature of the receptors in the ecological community. During a recent ecological risk assessment, the receptors of interest were macroinvertebrates present on the wetlands “floor.” To select the appropriate criterion – sediment or soil – it was first necessary to answer the following question: Are the invertebrate receptors terrestrial or aquatic? A macroinvertebrate survey provided the data to answer this question and guided the selection of the appropriate criteria. Approach/Activities. While there are insects whose larval stages are aquatic and whose adult stages are aerial and, in a sense, terrestrial, most macroinvertebrate species are obligated to either an aquatic or a terrestrial environment. The premise of the invertebrate survey was that the composition of the invertebrate species in a sample reflects the history of conditions that a particular location has experienced in the recent past. That is, the presence of terrestrial taxa and the absence of aquatic taxa in a sample indicate a habitat where drier, more upland conditions are most common; a sample containing mostly aquatic taxa indicates an aquatic regime. In November 2010, an invertebrate survey was performed in a wetland in the Pacific Northwest (site) to evaluate whether chemical concentrations in wetlands soil samples should be compared to soil or sediment criteria. Sample locations were selected from areas that – at the time of the survey – appeared to have been constantly inundated, occasionally inundated, and not inundated during the survey. The wetlands soil samples were collected to obtain representative species assemblages for aquatic and terrestrial communities within the wetland. Results/Lessons Learned. The site is dominated by trees and shrubs at higher elevations, and samples collected from these areas contained only terrestrial invertebrates. At lower elevation, certain features of the site – drainage ditch and depressions – were more apparently aquatic in nature and this was reflected in the samples collected from these locations, which contained almost exclusively aquatic invertebrates. By total area, the majority of the site is represented by habitat that contains a terrestrial invertebrate community. This approach, the use of biological community as an indicator of habitat type, can be a valuable technique in conducting ecological risk assessments for wetlands.
机译:背景/目标。生态风险评估涉及将计算的剂量与特定曝光情景的适当标准进行比较。选择该标准的相关性与关注物种和曝光途径的相关性。我们建议基于生态社区中受体性质的选择选择相关标准。在最近的生态风险评估期间,兴趣的受体是湿地“地板”上存在的大型脊椎门。选择适当的标准 - 沉积物或土壤 - 首先是有必要回答以下问题:是无脊椎动物受体的陆地或水生吗? Macroinvertebrete调查提供了数据来回答这个问题并指导选择适当的标准。方法/活动。虽然有昆虫幼虫阶段是水生,其成年阶段是空中的,并且在某种意义上,陆地,大多数大型畸形物种都有义务或陆地环境。无脊椎动物调查的前提是样品中无脊椎动物物种的组成反映了特定地点在最近经历过的条件历史。也就是说,样本中存在陆地分类群和水生分类群表明栖息地,更干燥,更多的高地条件是最常见的;含有大多数水生分类的样品表明了水生制性。 2010年11月,在太平洋西北(遗址)的湿地中进行了无脊椎动物调查,以评估湿地土壤样品中的化学浓度是否应与土壤或沉积物标准进行比较。从调查时的区域中选择了样品位置 - 似乎已经不断淹没,偶尔淹没,在调查期间没有被淹没。收集湿地土壤样品以获得湿地内的水生和陆地社区的代表性物种组合。结果/经验教训。该网站以较高的升高的树木和灌木为主,从这些区域收集的样品仅包含陆地无脊椎动物。在较低的高度升高时,现场排水沟和抑郁的某些特征 - 在自然界中更明显,这反映在从这些地点收集的样本中,它几乎完全完全水生无脊椎动物。通过总面积,该网站的大多数由栖息地代表,其中包含陆地无脊椎动物群落。这种方法,使用生物群体作为栖息地类型的指标,可以是对湿地进行生态风险评估的宝贵技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号