首页> 外文会议>International conference of the System Dynamics Society >ENGINEER OR ORACLE? (SD/ST viewed from the System-Thinking-Activity Approach)
【24h】

ENGINEER OR ORACLE? (SD/ST viewed from the System-Thinking-Activity Approach)

机译:工程师还是甲骨文? (从系统思考活动方法中查看SD / ST)

获取原文

摘要

This paper distinguishes between System Dynamics (SD) and Systems Thinking (ST).In order to discuss the similarities / differences and reciprocal functions a meta-positionis necessary. It is suggested that such a position exists in another-culture paradigm, i.e.in the System-Thinking-Activity (STA) approach, elaborated by the MoscowMethodological Circle (MMC). STA schemes are used to describe the sense of ST, asit is understood in SD. Using the STA approach, the problem solver is more an engineerthan the SD analyst who could be described as an oracle. Indicating a number of basicmethodological difficulties in the modern development of ST, the paper proposes aThinking-Activity Theory as an ontological foundation for SD/ST. The Activity-Organisational Games (AOG) method is considered as a way of analysing problemsituations and of problems solving. It is suggested that the assimilation of STAexperience by SD/ST could have many other significant consequences.
机译:本文区分了系统动力学(SD)和系统思考(ST)。 为了讨论相似/不同和倒数功能,请使用元位置 是必要的。有人建议这种立场存在于另一种文化范式中,即 莫斯科详细阐述的系统思考活动(STA)方法 方法圈(MMC)。 STA方案用于描述ST的意义,例如 在SD中可以理解。使用STA方法,问题解决者更像是工程师 比SD分析师(可以被描述为甲骨文)高。表明一些基本 在ST的现代发展中存在方法上的困难,本文提出了一个 思维活动理论作为SD / ST的本体论基础。活动- 组织博弈(AOG)方法被认为是一种分析问题的方法 情况和问题解决。建议STA的同化 SD / ST的经验可能会带来许多其他重大后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号