首页> 外文会议>International conference of the System Dynamics Society >Guiding New Product Development Pricing in an Automotive High Tech SME: When customer preferences are critical to strategic decisions using Conjoint Analysis adds needed precision to model formulation validation
【24h】

Guiding New Product Development Pricing in an Automotive High Tech SME: When customer preferences are critical to strategic decisions using Conjoint Analysis adds needed precision to model formulation validation

机译:在汽车高科技中小企业中指导新产品开发和定价:当客户偏好对于使用联合分析的战略决策至关重要时,可为模型制定和验证增加所需的精度

获取原文

摘要

This paper describes the use of system dynamics in combination with conjoint analysisto assist a high tech SME in evaluating different policy options in a context wherecustomer preferences were critical to strategic decision making. Conjoint analysisserved an important role in eliciting customers’ underlying multi-attribute choicepreferences, and had a significant impact on both the structure and parameterization ofthe final simulation model. The combination of methods was quite powerful in this caseand we feel could be successfully applied to a broad class of problems where behavioralpolicies of decision makers include tradeoffs among multiple attributes. In such cases,conjoint analysis- or other methods developed to address the multi-attribute choiceproblem- can add needed precision to model formulation and validation. The alternativeis to use SD as a stand-alone approach and employ formulations that are not empiricallyderived or grounded in the extensive choice theory literature. We suggest thisalternative is not viable when choice preferences are important for guiding strategicdecisions, and more generally we contend that appropriately integrating relevantmethods can substantially improve our system dynamics models and policy analysis.
机译:本文介绍了结合联合分析使用系统动力学的方法 协助高科技中小型企业在以下情况下评估不同的政策选择 客户的偏好对于战略决策至关重要。联合分析 在引起客户潜在的多属性选择方面发挥了重要作用 偏好,并且对的结构和参数化都有重大影响 最终的仿真模型。在这种情况下,方法的组合非常强大 并且我们认为可以成功地应用于行为 决策者的政策包括多种属性之间的权衡。在这种情况下, 联合分析或其他解决多属性选择的方法 问题-可以为模型制定和验证增加所需的精度。替代品 是将SD用作独立方法,并采用非经验性的公式 衍生于或基于广泛选择理论文献。我们建议这个 另一种方法是不可行的,当选择偏好指导战略重要 决定,更笼统地说,我们认为适当整合相关 方法可以大大改善我们的系统动力学模型和策略分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号