【24h】

XML, the web and database functionality?

机译:XML,Web和数据库功能?

获取原文

摘要

With the advance of XML, DTD's, XML-Schema, X-Path, X-Link, XML-Query, XML-Protocol, RDF, Semantic WEB and other information description tools and mechanisms the WEB develops more and more into a huge structured information and data network that becomes computer processable via "semi"-automatic "intelligent" means.However, most of these multimedia information resources are kept in hierarchical file-type systems or relatively unstructured relational systems with none or very little of what is commonly known as "database functionality" for the various information types represented.
  • Do we still need transaction properties, interoperability, security, reliability, scalability and others?
  • If yes, then why are these concepts not really taken into the WEB-world?
  • Are the database people too far away to be able to adopt their existing solutions?
  • Are the information system people too process-oriented to care about data?
  • Are the knowledge handlers too occupied with semantic representations and ontology discussions?
  • Does the document community even see the problem?
  • And do the WEB people care whether human resources are wasted through attempts to achieve database functionality through careful "behaviour"?
The panel will offer opinions about these aspects but will also want to raise these issues with the audience.
机译:随着XML,DTD,XML-Schema,X-Path,X-Link,XML-Query,XML-Protocol,RDF,语义WEB和其他信息描述工具和机制的发展,WEB越来越多地发展成为庞大的结构化信息以及通过“半”-自动“智能”方式变为计算机可处理的数据网络。但是,大多数这些多媒体信息资源都保存在分层文件类型系统或相对非结构化的关系系统中,而没有或只有很少的通常被称为表示的各种信息类型的“数据库功能”。
  • 我们仍然需要事务属性,互操作性,安全性,可靠性,可伸缩性等吗?
  • 如果是,那么为什么这些概念没有真正带入WEB领域?
  • 数据库人员离得太远而无法采用他们现有的解决方案吗?
  • 信息系统人员是否太注重流程而不关心数据?
  • 知识处理程序是否也太过语义表示和本体论讨论?
  • 文档社区是否甚至看到了问题?
  • WEB员工是否在意是否通过尝试通过谨慎的“行为”来实现数据库功能而浪费了人力资源? 小组将就这些方面发表意见,但也希望提出这些问题与观众。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号