首页> 外文会议>ASNT fall conference and quality testing show >In-Service Oil Tank Cleaning and Inspection System: Results of Eight (8) Independent Validations
【24h】

In-Service Oil Tank Cleaning and Inspection System: Results of Eight (8) Independent Validations

机译:在役油箱清洁和检查系统:八(8)个独立验证的结果

获取原文

摘要

The structural integrity of bulk liquid storage tanks has been a major area of concern to the petrochemical industry for a number of years. Although API 653 remains the industry standard relative to tank inspection and maintenance, the frequency of testing and inspection can also be affected by various state and local regulations. The schedule of this inspection process may depend on a number of factors including the age of the tank, its proximity to groundwater, the leak record of the tank, the date of the tank's last integrity test, the construction material of the tank, the product stored, soil conditions, previous corrosion rate calculations, etc. One of the critical areas of integrity testing is that of the tank bottom. Traditional methods of bottom inspection have required the emptying of the tank's product and a thorough cleaning and degassing prior to the allowance of personnel entry for a floor inspection. There are significant advantages to the tank owner if proper bottom inspection can be completed while the tank is in-service. Robotic technology is now available as a method for acquiring quantitative information for determining the integrity of aboveground storage tank floors while the tank remains on-line and in-service. API 653 allows the use of robotics as an alternative method for assessing the condition of a tank floor as long as certain conditions are met. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the results of tests at several operating refineries and terminals comparing in-service ultrasonic bottom inspections of tanks to the results of traditional out-of-service inspections. Each tank was inspected using an oil tank inspection system operated by InTANK Services, Inc. The first test was conducted in 1994 and the last test completed in March 2000. All validations were conducted by independent tank inspection organizations or the tank owner's tank inspection staff. All validation inspectors were API-653 certified inspectors. The objective of the in-service inspections was to quantitatively establish the parameters that would set the next internal inspection. This was achieved by providing the capability of returning to precise locations within the tank over a span of several years in order to compute accurate corrosion rate calculations.
机译:多年来,散装液体储罐的结构完整性一直是石化行业关注的主要领域。尽管API 653仍然是有关油罐检查和维护的行业标准,但是测试和检查的频率也会受到各种州和地方法规的影响。此检查过程的时间表可能取决于许多因素,包括储罐的使用年限,其与地下水的接近程度,储罐的泄漏记录,储罐的最后一次完整性测试的日期,储罐的结构材料,产品储存条件,土壤条件,先前的腐蚀速率计算等。完整性测试的关键领域之一是储罐底部。传统的底部检查方法要求先清空储罐产品,并在允许人员进入地板检查之前进行彻底的清洁和除气。如果在储罐投入使用时可以完成适当的底部检查,则对储罐拥有者具有明显的优势。如今,机器人技术已成为一种获取定量信息的方法,可用于确定地面储油罐地板的完整性,同时使储油罐保持在线和运行状态。只要满足某些条件,API 653允许使用机器人技术作为评估罐底条件的替代方法。本文的目的是总结几个运行中的炼油厂和码头的测试结果,将罐的在役超声底部检查与传统的不在役检查进行比较。使用InTANK Services,Inc.运营的油箱检查系统对每个油箱进行了检查。第一次测试于1994年进行,最后一次测试于2000年3月完成。所有验证均由独立的油箱检查组织或油箱所有者的油箱检查人员进行。所有验证检查员都是经过API-653认证的检查员。在役检查的目的是定量建立确定下一次内部检查的参数。这是通过提供能够在数年内返回到罐内精确位置的能力来实现的,从而能够计算出准确的腐蚀速率计算结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号