首页> 外文会议>American Water Works Association (AWWA) annual conference >Monochloramine and Chlorine Dioxide as Alternative Disinfection Met Meth For Legionella Control: Results of Pilot-studies in a Model Plumbing
【24h】

Monochloramine and Chlorine Dioxide as Alternative Disinfection Met Meth For Legionella Control: Results of Pilot-studies in a Model Plumbing

机译:一氯胺和二氧化氯作为军团菌控制的替代消毒方法:模型管道的试验研究结果

获取原文

摘要

Legionnaires’ disease can be prevented by eradication of Legionella from the water systems ofhospitals, industrial plants, apartment and office buildings. Currently recommended methods forLegionella pneumophila inactivation are thermal disinfection and hyperchlorination. However, eachhas significant disadvantages such that alternative disinfection approaches are needed.Monochloramine (NH2Cl) and chlorine dioxide (ClO2) are potential alternatives to chlorine that havereceived much attention in recent years. Monochloramine is considered to be a good secondarydisinfectant due to its stability, better prevention of bacterial re-growth, superior ability to penetratebiofilm, reduced disinfection by-products (DBPs), and no taste and odor problems. But little is knownabout the efficacy of monochloramine against environmentally grown Legionella, especially againstbiofilm-associated Legionella. Chlorine dioxide is a strong oxidant with no taste and odor problemsand minimal generation of DBPs. However, use of chlorine dioxide has been limited because ofdifficulties with safe on-site production. A new chlorine dioxide generating system (Halox, BridgeportCT) uses an electrochemical process that appears to be safe, and easy-to-control. The objective of thisstudy was to compare the efficacy of monochloramine, chlorine dioxide and chlorine againstLegionella and heterotrophic bacteria in a model plumbing system at pH 7.0 ~ 8.0 and temperature of25°~30°C. Monochloramine and chlorine were tested at a single dose of 2.0 mg/L and 4.0 mg/L as Cl2individually. Chlorine dioxide was tested at a single dose of 2.0 mg/L as ClO2 and at an initial dose of2.0 mg/L followed by maintaining a 0.5 mg/L residual within the system.A 99.9% inactivation (3-log reduction from initial population) of Legionella in both biofilmand planktonic phases was observed within 0.5 hours of contact for chlorine, monochloramine andchlorine dioxide at all the concentration tested in this study. Results showed that monochloramine at a
机译:可以通过从水系统中消灭军团菌来预防军团菌病 医院,工业厂房,公寓和办公楼。目前推荐的方法 嗜肺军团菌的灭活是热消毒和高氯化。但是,每个 具有明显的缺点,因此需要替代的消毒方法。 一氯胺(NH2Cl)和二氧化氯(ClO2)是氯的潜在替代品 近年来备受关注。一氯胺被认为是一种很好的辅助剂 消毒剂具有稳定性,更好地防止细菌再生,渗透能力强 生物膜,减少了消毒副产物(DBP),并且没有味道和气味问题。但是鲜为人知 关于一氯胺对环境生长的军团菌的功效,特别是对 生物膜相关军团菌。二氧化氯是一种强氧化剂,无味无味 和最少的DBP生成。然而,由于以下原因,二氧化氯的使用受到限制。 安全现场生产的困难。一种新的二氧化氯生成系统(Halox,Bridgeport CT)使用了一种看起来安全且易于控制的电化学过程。这个目的 研究是为了比较一氯胺,二氧化氯和氯对 在pH 7.0〜8.0和温度为7.0〜8.0的模型管道系统中的军团菌和异养细菌。 25°〜30°C。单氯胺和氯以2.0 mg / L和4.0 mg / L的单剂量Cl2进行测试 个别地。二氧化氯以2.0 mg / L的单剂量ClO2和初始剂量的二氧化氯进行测试。 2.0 mg / L,然后在系统内保持0.5 mg / L的残留量。 两种生物膜中军团菌的灭活率均达到99.9%(从初始种群减少3-log) 氯,一氯胺和 在这项研究中测试的所有浓度的二氧化氯。结果表明一氯胺在

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号