首页> 外文会议>Rapid excavation and tunneling conference >INITIAL GROUND SUPPORT FOR TUNNELING IN CENTRAL TEXAS, FROM DESIGNER'S AND OWNER'S PERSPECTIVES
【24h】

INITIAL GROUND SUPPORT FOR TUNNELING IN CENTRAL TEXAS, FROM DESIGNER'S AND OWNER'S PERSPECTIVES

机译:德克萨斯州中部的隧道初始地面支持,来自设计师和所有者的观点

获取原文

摘要

Geologically, central Texas inherits one of the best tunneling media, "Austin Chalk" alongside some troublesome, weak sedimentary rock or pyroclastic materials, namely Grayson Marl and calcareous claystone or shale. The weak inhomogeneous rock mass usually exhibits relatively short stand-up time, which would require quick installation of closely spaced initial ground support, while Austin Chalk can have stand-up times exceeding several months and no more than spot bolting for stabilization. From a recently completed tunneling project in the Austin Metropolitan area and our literature review of past tunneling projects furnished in central Texas, structural and economical comparisons are made between each routinely used tunnel support system in terms of capacity, deformability, design and construction considerations, cost, and risks associated with unexpected fault zones, slaking, groundwater inflow, and block/rock fall, based on our design experiences. Finally, differences between the designer's and contractor's value engineered ground support systems are discussed from the owner's perspectives.
机译:地质上,德克萨斯州中心继承了最好的隧道媒体之一,“奥斯汀粉笔”以及一些麻烦,弱沉积岩或发球材料,即Grayson Marl和钙质粘土或页岩。弱不均匀的岩体质量通常表现出相对较短的安装时间,这需要快速安装紧密间隔的初始接地支撑,而奥斯汀粉笔可能具有超过几个月的竖立时间,并且不超过稳定的斑点螺栓。从奥斯汀大都市区的最近完成的隧道项目以及我们在德克萨斯州中部提供的过去的隧道项目的文献综述,在每个经常使用的隧道支持系统之间进行了结构和经济比较,就能力,可变形性,设计和施工考虑,成本基于我们的设计体验,与意外断层区,泥浆,地下水流入和岩石落下相关的风险。最后,从业主的角度讨论了设计者和承包商价值的地面支持系统之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号