首页> 外文会议>Intersociety energy conversion engineering conference;IECEC >COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF DIRECT PHOTOVOLTAIC AND AC RECTIFIED POWER SUPPLIES FOR BATTERY CHARGING
【24h】

COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF DIRECT PHOTOVOLTAIC AND AC RECTIFIED POWER SUPPLIES FOR BATTERY CHARGING

机译:电池充电的直接光伏和交流整流电源的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

The Clean Energy and Vehicle Research Center at the University of South Florida (USF) is operating a 20 kW (peak) photovoltaic (PV) system in which PV panels form the roof of a 12 bay carport. 4 of the 12 bays has a potential 6kW output that can be used for simultaneous computer controlled direct DC-DC charging and utility interconnection. The program has been created to evaluate the potential contribution of photovoltaics as a method for offsetting the fuel cost of electric vehicles while reducing air pollution generated by power plants, that are fueled by non-renewable sources.When charging lead acid batteries in an EV, a large percentage (22%-40%) of the charging power is lost, which raises the cost of operation. The charger losses usually include power conditioning, power factor, and heat losses, which cumulatively can range between 3%-25%. Manufactures neglect the losses that occur inside of the battery pack when testing chargers to quantify their efficiencies. The battery pack is usually assumed to have an inherent 20% loss when accepting charging power. However, this 20% loss is not a constant and can be affected by the charging process.To determine the impact that charging has on battery losses, two chargers with different power conditioning and charging algorithms will be used under controlled conditions. The battery pack is a 120V 183Ah (5 hr rate) flooded lead acid system located in a Chevy S-10 EV. The first charger (charger A) derives its power from the 6kW photovoltaic array. This charger is computer controlled and prevents gassing throughout the entire charge. This power is pure DC with no ripple. The second charger (charger B) derives its power from the 208V single phase AC grid. This power is condition through a transformer and then rectified with no filtering. The charger conducts only when the rectified voltage exceeds that of the battery pack, which results in the output consisting of current ripples. Duringthe last 20% of charge the power is not reduced at a rate adequate to prevent gassing. Test results will be presented to show the extent the ripple power of charger B causes losses in the battery pack, how it influences the battery temperature and the extra losses associated during the gassing phase.
机译:南佛罗里达大学(USF)的清洁能源和车辆研究中心正在运行一个20 kW(峰值)的光伏(PV)系统,该系统中的PV板构成了一个12湾车棚的屋顶。 12个机架中的4个具有6kW的潜在输出,可用于同时由计算机控制的直接DC-DC充电和公用事业互连。创建该程序的目的是评估光伏发电的潜在贡献,以此作为抵消电动汽车燃料成本同时减少由发电厂产生的空气污染的方法,这种空气污染是由不可再生资源提供的。 当在电动汽车中对铅酸电池充电时,会损失很大一部分(22%-40%)的充电功率,从而增加了运营成本。充电器的损耗通常包括功率调节,功率因数和热量损耗,这些损耗的累计范围可能在3%-25%之间。制造商忽略了在测试充电器以量化其效率时在电池组内部发生的损耗。通常,当接受充电电源时,电池组固有损耗为20%。但是,这20%的损耗不是恒定的,并且会受到充电过程的影响。 为了确定充电对电池损耗的影响,将在受控条件下使用两个具有不同功率调节和充电算法的充电器。电池组是位于Chevy S-10 EV中的120V 183Ah(5小时速率)充满铅酸的系统。第一个充电器(充电器A)从6kW光伏阵列中获取电能。该充电器由计算机控制,可防止在整个充电过程中产生气体。此电源是纯直流电,没有纹波。第二个充电器(充电器B)从208V单相交流电网获取功率。该电源通过变压器调节,然后不经滤波即可整流。充电器仅在整流电压超过电池组的电压时导电,这会导致输出包含电流纹波。期间 最后20%的电量不会以足以防止放气的速率降低功率。将给出测试结果,以显示充电器B的纹波功率在电池组中造成损耗的程度,它如何影响电池温度以及在充气阶段产生的额外损耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号