首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >2FA Might Be Secure, But It’s Not Usable: A Summative Usability Assessment of Google’s Two-factor Authentication (2FA) Methods
【24h】

2FA Might Be Secure, But It’s Not Usable: A Summative Usability Assessment of Google’s Two-factor Authentication (2FA) Methods

机译:2FA可能是安全的,但它不可用:谷歌的双因素认证(2FA)方法的总结可用性评估

获取原文

摘要

Computer security experts recommend that people use two-factor authentication (2FA) on passwordprotected systems to help keep hackers out. Providing two pieces of information to verify a person’sidentity adds extra security to an account. However, it is not clear if the added security and proceduresimpact system usability. This paper aims to answer this question by assessing per ISO 9241-11’s suggestedmeasurements the usability of Google’s optional 2FA methods. We found few differences across fourdifferent 2FA methods when comparing efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction measures—illustratingthat one method is not necessarily more or less usable then another. Overall, the measures indicated that thesystems’ usability needed to be improved, especially with regard to the initial setup of 2FA. In conclusion,developers need to focus more attention on making 2FA easier and faster to use, especially since it is oftenoptional for password users, yet makes accounts significantly more secure.
机译:计算机安全专家建议人们在密码上使用双因素身份验证(2FA)受保护的系统,以帮助保持黑客。提供两条信息来验证一个人的信息身份为帐户增加了额外的安全性。但是,如果增加的安全性和程序,则不清楚影响系统可用性。本文旨在通过评估每个ISO 9241-11所建议的问题回答这个问题测量谷歌可选的2FA方法的可用性。我们发现四个差异很少在比较效率,有效性和满足措施时不同的2FA方法 - 说明那种方法不一定或多或少可用于另一个方法。总体而言,措施表示系统的可用性需要改进,特别是关于2FA的初始设置。综上所述,开发人员需要更加关注制作2FA更容易,更快地使用,特别是因为它经常适用于密码用户,但账户明显安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号