首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >EMG and heart rate used to validate ergonomic benefits of a bent-handled floor finish applicator
【24h】

EMG and heart rate used to validate ergonomic benefits of a bent-handled floor finish applicator

机译:EMG和心率用于验证弯曲的底层涂抹器的符合人体工程学效果

获取原文

摘要

Prior to releasing the design of a new bent-handled floor finish applicator for full-scale production, its manufacturer commissioned a quantitative research study to validate its intended ergonomic benefits. Unlike the traditional braided mop and bucket, this new design dispensed finish from a 2.5 liter replaceable reservoir purposefully positioned on a bent handle to afford balance and control. Electromyography (EMG), heart rate (HR), timed activity analysis, and subjective self-report measures were used to quantify the design's physiological impact, both actual and perceived, on 6 representative users. The new bent-handled design was compared to three other commercially available applicator systems: a traditional mop and bucket commonly used in the United States, a flat mop preferred in Europe and Asia, and a commercially available backpack system. Compared to the traditional mop and bucket, the average combined set-up, finish application, and clean-up of the bent-handled applicator cumulatively required 36% less forearm flexor effort, 35% less deltoid effort, 23% less trapezius effort, and 36% less erector spinae effort. The bent-handled applicator required 18% less forearm flexor effort, 54% less deltoid effort, 40% less trapezius effort, and 49% less erector spinae effort when compared to the European flat mop. Compared to a backpack system, the bent-handled applicator required 10% more forearm flexor effort, 2% less deltoid effort, 8% less trapezius effort, and 8% more erector spinae effort. Taking into account both heart rate (beats per minute) and duration (min) over the set-up, finish application, and clean-up, the bent-handled applicator required 23% fewer average heart beats than the mop and bucket, 32% fewer than a flat mop, and 0.5% more than a backpack system. These statistically significant findings validated the subjective measures, indicating that this new bent-handled design decreases effort and increases comfort.
机译:在释放新的弯曲处理楼层涂布器的设计之前,其制造商委托了定量的研究,以验证其预期的人体工程学效果。与传统的编织拖把和桶不同,这款新设计从2.5升可更换储层中分配了饰面,目的地定位在弯曲的手柄上,以提供平衡和控制。肌电图(EMG),心率(HR),定时活动分析和主观自我报告措施用于量化设计的生理影响,既有6名代表用户则实际和感知。将新的弯曲处理设计与其他三种商用涂抹器系统进行比较:传统的拖把和桶常用于美国,在欧洲和亚洲优选的平板拖把以及商业上可用的背包系统。与传统的拖把和铲斗相比,平均结合的设置,完成应用和弯曲处理涂抹器的清理累积需要36%的前臂屈曲努力,少量替代力量减少35%,较低的速度减少23%,而且36%的射击型乳头努力。弯曲的涂抹器需要18%的前臂屈曲效力,少量替代努力减少54%,较低的速度少40%,与欧洲平拖把相比,施工速度减少了49%。与背包系统相比,弯曲的涂抹器需要10%的前臂屈肌努力,减少速度减少了2%,较低的速度少8%,施工速度较少8%。考虑到心率(每分钟节拍)和持续时间(min)通过设置,完成应用和清理,弯曲的涂抹器需要比拖把和桶更少的平均心跳减少23%,32%少于扁平拖把,比背包系统多0.5%。这些统计上有重大的调查结果验证了主观措施,表明这一新的弯曲处理的设计降低了努力并提高了舒适度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号