首页> 外文会议>TAGA annual technical conference >Color Quality Comparison of Electro-Photographic vs. Inkjet Printing Processes In a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW)
【24h】

Color Quality Comparison of Electro-Photographic vs. Inkjet Printing Processes In a Color Managed Digital Printing Workflow (CMDPW)

机译:彩色管理数字印刷工作流程中电泳与喷墨打印过程的颜色质量比较(CMDPW)

获取原文

摘要

n a quest to empower students to better understand the colorimetric attributes of color, this work will examine the industry standard printing process and quality management practices similar to those a student would encounter upon entering into the industry. Hence, for a student to consistently deliver a quality print, managing and controlling color from the input device to a multicolor output device is a major concern for the graphics and imaging educator. Analyzing the color image by examining its quantitative attributes eliminates the subjective judgment on color quality evaluation of printed colors or colors in nature. The quality of digital color printing is determined by these influential factors: screening method applied, type of printing process, ink (dry-toner or liquid-toner), and the substrate (paper). For this research, only the color attributes, such as: hue, gray balance, and overall color deviations will be analyzed to examine the significant differences that exist in the two digital printing processes, as these are the attributes which are monitored and managed for quality accuracy during the printing. Printed colorimetry of these two printing processes will be compared against ISO 12647-7 digital printing standards colorimetry to determine the color quality deviation or tolerances. The purpose of this experimental study is to determine the significant differences that exist among the printed primary colors hue (AH ) deviation [Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and Black (CMYK)], overall average (AE) color (CMYKRGB) deviation and gray hue (overlap of CMY) deviation (AH) of the two printing processes, namely: Color Electro-photographic and Inkjet. The experiment will be conducted in a color managed digital printing workflow (CMDPW) to determine the significant differences that exist in the color quality of electro-photographic vs. inkjet printing, based on the colorimetric and statistical evaluation among two different types of printing processes. Each printing process in the experiment will be considered as a group, noted by letter "K" (K = 2). This study will focus on the measurement of color prints, printed on the same type of substrate (80 LBS. gloss coated paper) by using a color electro-photographic (color laser) printer and an inkjet printer. The following one-tailed non-directional multiple hypotheses are established for this study, because of the two independent groups of printers (groups, K = 2). A one-tailed non-directional hypothesis predicts the nature of the effect of the independent group on the dependent variable (or the color attribute as the outcome). Note: This manuscript was not received in time for publication in the 2018 TAG A Proceedings.
机译:n追求学生更好地了解颜色的比色属性,这项工作将检查行业标准印刷过程和类似于学生在进入业内时会遇到的质量管理实践。因此,对于学生一致地提供质量打印,从输入设备管理和控制颜色到多色输出设备是图形和成像教育者的主要问题。通过检查其定量属性分析彩色图像消除了对颜色或颜色的颜色质量评估的主观判断。数字彩色印刷质量取决于这些影响因素:筛选方法应用,印刷过程的类型,油墨(干式调色剂或液体调色剂)和基材(纸)。对于本研究,将仅分析颜色属性,例如:色调,灰色平衡和整体颜色偏差,以检查两个数字打印过程中存在的显着差异,因为这些是监视和管理质量的属性印刷过程中的准确性。将与ISO 12647-7的数字印刷标准比色测量进行比较这两个打印过程的印刷色度以确定颜色质量偏差或公差。该实验研究的目的是确定印刷的原色色调色调(AH)偏差中存在的显着差异[青色,品红色,黄色和黑色(CMYK)],总体平均(AE)颜色(CMYKRGB)偏差和灰色色调(CMY重叠)偏差(AH)的两个打印过程,即:彩色电影和喷墨。该实验将在彩色管理数字印刷工作流程(CMDPW)中进行,以确定电子照片与喷墨印刷的颜色质量存在的显着差异,基于两种不同类型的打印过程中的比色和统计评估。实验中的每个印刷过程将被认为是由字母“k”(k = 2)注意的组。本研究将专注于通过使用彩色电影(彩色激光)打印机和喷墨打印机在相同类型的基板(80磅。光泽涂布纸)上印刷颜色印刷品的测量。由于两组独立的打印机组(组,k = 2),建立了以下一尾非定向多假设。单尾非定向假设预测独立组对从属变量(或颜色属性作为结果)的效果的性质。注意:本手稿未及时收到2018年标签的出版物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号