【24h】

An electromyographic study of two differnet types of ballpoint pens

机译:两种不同类型的圆珠笔的肌电图研究

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this study is to compare a New pen (N pen) with a conventional pen (C pen) for the load that they exert on the upper limb during 1 h of continuous writing. EMG and upper limb pain scores are used as indicators. C pen's grip area is cylindrical with an 8.3-mm diameter, and is manufactured of hard plastic, which is rigid and slippery. N pen has a cylindrical grip area that flares out at the bottom, near the pen-tip, and has a diameter ranging from 11.9 - 13.6 mm, and the grip is constructed of a 2 to 3 mm-thick silicon rubber sleeve that is softer and less slippery than C pen. Twelve students transcribed an English text for 1 h, alternately using the two pens. The EMG of the flexor pollicis brevis and the pain scores for the thumb, forefinger, middle finger, forearm and shoulder were significantly lower for N pen than for C pen.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较一支新笔(N笔)和一支普通笔(C笔)在连续书写1小时期间它们施加在上肢上的负荷。肌电图和上肢疼痛评分用作指标。 C笔的握持区域是直径为8.3毫米的圆柱形,并由坚硬且光滑的硬质塑料制成。 N笔具有一个圆柱形的握柄区域,该区域在底部靠近笔尖处向外张开,直径范围为11.9-13.6 mm,握柄由2至3 mm厚的硅橡胶套筒构成,较柔软而且比C笔更滑。 12名学生交替使用两支笔记录1个小时的英语文本。 N笔的屈肌短肌肌电图和拇指,食指,中指,前臂和肩膀的疼痛评分明显低于C笔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号