首页> 外文会议> >The Ethics of Knowledge Transfers and Conversions: Property or Privacy Rights?
【24h】

The Ethics of Knowledge Transfers and Conversions: Property or Privacy Rights?

机译:知识转移和转化的伦理:财产权还是隐私权?

获取原文

摘要

Closely related to organizational learning, knowledge creation, knowledge codification, and knowledge reuse, knowledge transfers of tacit knowledge between individuals and conversions of tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge raise important issues regarding the use of ethics and self-interest as counter determinants. Do organizations "own" the knowledge of their employees, or is this knowledge an "attribute" of an autonomous individual and subject to protection under human rights to privacy or security-of-person? This paper explores these opposite viewpoints from the perspectives of knowledge management and human rights. Consequently, organizational knowledge may fall under the intellectual property theory and organizations have the right to buy, sell and use their corporate knowledge as it suits their needs, while personal knowledge may fall under the personal privacy theory and individuals have the right to protect the security of their personal knowledge. Thus, knowledge management practices may differ with regard to the two types of knowledge.
机译:与组织学习,知识创造,知识编纂和知识重用密切相关,个人之间的隐性知识的知识转移以及隐性知识向显性知识的转化引发了关于使用道德和自利作为反决定因素的重要问题。组织是“拥有”其员工的知识,还是该知识是自治个人的“属性”,并受到隐私权或人身安全权的保护?本文从知识管理和人权的角度探讨了这些相反的观点。因此,组织知识可能属于知识产权理论的范畴,组织有权根据自己的需要购买,出售和使用其公司知识,而个人知识可能属于个人隐私理论的范畴,并且个人有权保护安全性。他们的个人知识。因此,关于两种类型的知识,知识管理实践可能有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号