首页> 外文会议> >Performance/Cost Comparison between Single-Stage and Conventional High Power Factor Correction Rectifiers
【24h】

Performance/Cost Comparison between Single-Stage and Conventional High Power Factor Correction Rectifiers

机译:单级和常规高功率因数校正整流器之间的性能/成本比较

获取原文

摘要

A cost review and performance comparison between Single-Stage and Conventional High Power Factor Correction Rectifiers is presented in this paper. A new family of converters is often presented detailing electrical performance, yet discounting a cost evaluation of the topology; this paper attempts to address this issue. Detailed is an overview of two such topologies based upon a Boost Converter, for Input Current Shaping, ICS, and a Forward Converter for output regulation. The paper outlines essential design equations for the Single-Stage approach, discussing issues of importance and predicted behavior of such a design. The focus then moves onto measured operational performances of two 170W prototype PFC rectifiers, a Two-Stage and a Single-Stage respectively. Results obtained display comparable electrical performance, both in their abilities to limit input current harmonics and regulate the output voltage. However, a cost analysis that was performed indicated that monetary savings with the Single-Stage variants are not as significant as one would first expect. The unexpectedly small savings are a combination of the requirement for components with ratings that can withstand the stresses applied to them, and current market trends.
机译:本文介绍了单级和常规高功率因数校正整流器之间的成本评估和性能比较。通常会提出一个新的转换器系列,其中详细介绍了电气性能,但不考虑拓扑的成本评估;本文试图解决这个问题。详细概述了两种基于升压转换器(用于输入电流整形)和用于输出调节的正向转换器的拓扑。本文概述了单阶段方法的基本设计方程式,并讨论了此类设计的重要性和预期行为。然后,重点转移到两个170W原型PFC整流器(分别为两级和单级)的测得的操作性能上。所获得的结果在限制输入电流谐波和调节输出电压的能力方面显示出可比的电气性能。但是,进行的成本分析表明,单阶段变型所节省的资金并不像人们最初期望的那样可观。出乎意料的少量节省是对部件的要求以及能够承受施加于其上的压力的额定值以及当前市场趋势的结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号