首页> 外文会议> >Performance Comparison of Existing Mobility Management Schemes for NGN
【24h】

Performance Comparison of Existing Mobility Management Schemes for NGN

机译:NGN现有移动性管理方案的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

A variety of schemes for mobility are currently studied in ITU-T, 3GPP, IETF, and so on. The ITU-T (SG-19) considers Q.MMF, the 3GPP standardized IMS, the IETF currently uses Mobile IP (MIP). For supporting mobility, there are many performance parameters, such as location registration delay, handover delay, packet delivery delay, signaling cost, location update cost, packet delivery cost. However the performance comparison of all existing schemes is not examined as yet. So, this paper investigates and compares the performance of MIPv6, IP2, Q.MMF, IMS to location registration. The time and cost of location registration are associated with the flow of messages between entities according to the procedure. We investigate the variation and performance comparison in the location registration time and cost using the performance metric.
机译:当前在ITU-T,3GPP,IETF等中研究了各种用于移动性的方案。 ITU-T(SG-19)考虑了Q.MMF,3GPP标准化IMS,IETF当前使用移动IP(MIP)。为了支持移动性,存在许多性能参数,例如位置注册延迟,切换延迟,分组传递延迟,信令成本,位置更新成本,分组传递成本。但是,目前尚未检查所有现有方案的性能比较。因此,本文研究并比较了MIPv6,IP 2 ,Q.MMF,IMS与位置注册的性能。根据该过程,位置注册的时间和成本与实体之间的消息流相关联。我们使用性能指标调查了位置注册时间和成本中的差异和性能比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号