首页> 外文会议> >Iterative and One-shot Conferencing in Relay Channels
【24h】

Iterative and One-shot Conferencing in Relay Channels

机译:中继通道中的迭代会议和一次性会议

获取原文

摘要

We compare the rates of one-shot and iterative conferencing in a cooperative Gaussian relay channel. The relay and receiver cooperate via a conference, as introduced by Willems, in which they exchange a series of communications over orthogonal links. Under one-shot conferencing, decode-and-forward (DF) is capacity-achieving when the relay has a strong channel. On the other hand, Wyner-Ziv compress-and-forward (CF) approaches the cut-set bound when the conference link capacity is large. To contrast with one-shot conferencing, we consider a two-round iterative conference scheme; it comprises CF in the first round, and DF in the second. When the relay has a weak channel, the iterative scheme is disadvantageous. However, when the relay channel is strong, iterative cooperation, with optimal allocation of conferencing resources, outperforms one-shot cooperation provided that the conference link capacity is large. When precise allocation of conferencing resources is not possible, we consider iterative cooperation with symmetric conference links, and show that the iterative scheme still surpasses one-shot cooperation, albeit under more restricted conditions.
机译:我们在合作的高斯中继通道中比较单次会议和迭代会议的速率。中继器和接收器通过由Willems引入的会议进行协作,在会议中,他们通过正交链路交换一系列通信。在单次会议下,当中继具有强大的信道时,解码转发(DF)可以实现容量。另一方面,当会议链接容量很大时,Wyner-Ziv压缩和转发(CF)会接近剪切定界。为了与一键式会议形成对比,我们考虑了两轮迭代会议方案。它在第一轮中包含CF,在第二轮中包含DF。当中继具有弱信道时,迭代方案是不利的。但是,当中继通道很强时,如果会议链接容量较大,则在具有最佳会议资源分配的情况下,迭代协作的性能将优于一键式协作。当无法精确分配会议资源时,我们考虑使用对称会议链接进行迭代合作,并表明尽管在更严格的条件下,该迭代方案仍超过一次性合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号