首页> 外文会议> >Does lexical stress or metrical stress better predict word boundaries in Dutch?
【24h】

Does lexical stress or metrical stress better predict word boundaries in Dutch?

机译:词汇重音或度量重音是否可以更好地预测荷兰语中的单词边界?

获取原文

摘要

For both human and automatic speech recognizers, it is difficult to segment continuous speech into discrete units such as words. Word segmentation is so hard because there seem to be no self-evident cues for word boundaries in the speech stream. However, it has been suggested that English listeners can profit from the occurrence of full vowels (i.e. vowels with metrical stress) in the speech stream to make a first good guess about the location of word boundaries. The CELEX database study described in this paper investigates whether such a strategy is also feasible for Dutch, and whether the occurrence of full vowels or the occurrence of vowels with primary word stress (i.e. vowels with lexical stress) is a better cue for word boundaries. The CELEX counts suggest that, for Dutch, metrical stress seems to be a better predictor of word boundaries than lexical stress.
机译:对于人类和自动语音识别器而言,很难将连续的语音分割成离散的单元,例如单词。单词分割非常困难,因为在语音流中似乎没有针对单词边界的不言而喻的提示。但是,已经建议英语听众可以从语音流中出现完整的元音(即具有音调重音的元音)中获益,从而对单词边界的位置做出第一个好的猜测。本文所述的CELEX数据库研究调查了这种策略是否也适用于荷兰语,以及出现完整元音还是具有主要单词重音的元音(即具有词重音的元音)是否是更好的单词边界提示。 CELEX的计数表明,对于荷兰语而言,与词汇重音相比,度量重音似乎是单词边界的更好预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号