首页> 外文会议> >Standardization-a new discipline?
【24h】

Standardization-a new discipline?

机译:标准化-一门新学科?

获取原文

摘要

Verman (1973) was the first to call standardization a discipline. But is it, or should it be, an academic discipline as well? In this contribution we will address this question. After a short introduction we roughly assess the maturity of standardization as a scientific discipline. Then, we choose a more fundamental approach. We map the field of current and possible scientific research by characterizing the standardization phenomenon and by confronting this with a systematic listing of sciences based on the philosophy of Dooyeweerd (1955, 1957) and, then, confronting this with current standardization literature. This enables us to distinguish some blank areas on the map of standardization research and it may form the basis for future systematic standardization research. Finally we answer the question whether or not standardization is or should be an academic discipline.
机译:Verman(1973)是第一个称为标准化的纪律。但是,还是应该是学科的,也是如此?在这一贡献中,我们将解决这个问题。经过简短的介绍,我们大致评估标准化的成熟度为科学纪律。然后,我们选择更基本的方法。我们通过表征标准化现象和基于Doooyeweerd哲学(1955,1957)的系统上市,并通过基于Doooyeweerd(1955,1957)的哲学来映射当前和可能的科学研究领域。然后,用当前的标准化文献面对这一点。这使我们能够区分某些空白区域在标准化研究的地图上,并且可能构成未来系统标准化研究的基础。最后,我们回答了标准化是或应该是学科的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号