首页> 外文会议> >Marine security and international law: government seizure of vessels in peacetime
【24h】

Marine security and international law: government seizure of vessels in peacetime

机译:海洋安全和国际法:政府在和平时期扣押船只

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the contemporary international law concerning the seizure of vessels on the high seas in peacetime. It first notes the importance of the principle of flag state control of vessels on the high seas, and then examines exceptions to that principle that are enshrined in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea . The 1982 Convention, which entered into force in November 1994, has great significance in international law. Eighty-one states are now parties to it. The states parties include both developing and developed states, though not yet the United States. Provisions of the Convention concerning sea-bed mining delayed its entry into force, but the Convention's articles concerning authority to board or seize vessels have not generated widespread controversy. Even nonparties often rely on many parts of the Convention, asserting that they state customary international law. Despite its significance, however, the 1982 Convention is not the only source that addresses exceptions to the principle of flag state control of vessels on the high seas. The later sections of this paper note other relevant treaties and arguments grounded in customary international law.
机译:本文的目的是概述有关和平时期在公海扣押船只的当代国际法。它首先指出了船旗国控制公海船只原则的重要性,然后研究了1982年《联合国海洋法公约》所载的该原则的例外情况。 1994年11月生效的1982年《公约》在国际法中具有重要意义。现在有81个国家加入了该条约。缔约国包括发展中国家和发达国家,但尚未包括美国。 《公约》关于海底采矿的规定推迟了其生效,但是《公约》关于登船或扣押船舶的权利的条款并未引起广泛争议。即使是非当事方,也常常依赖《公约》的许多部分,声称它们陈述了习惯国际法。尽管具有重要意义,但《 1982年公约》并不是解决船旗国控制公海船只原则的唯一来源。本文的后面各节介绍了习惯国际法中的其他相关条约和论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号