首页> 外文会议>Marketing/Technical/Regulatory Sessions of the Composites Institute's 51st Annual Conference amp; EXPO '96 February 5-7, 1996 >Discussion on FRP Design Properties Based on Flexural Tests (ASTM D-790) and Tensile Tests (ASTM D-638)
【24h】

Discussion on FRP Design Properties Based on Flexural Tests (ASTM D-790) and Tensile Tests (ASTM D-638)

机译:基于挠曲测试(ASTM D-790)和拉伸测试(ASTM D-638)的FRP设计特性的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Tensile and flexural test results on the same laminate can have significant difference with the reported flexural strength being up to 100percent greater than the tensile strength using the standard ASTM reporting methods. Taken at face value, these results can lead to non conservative designs. The flexural test method is much simpler and less expensive, but must be used with a clear understanding of how they were computed and with sound engineering judgement since the flexural strength is calculated with linear bending theory at failure loads that are usually in the non linear range. This is significnat since the general accepted design practice is to use linear theory in the design of FRP equipment. Manufactures reporting this value should thus have a clear understanding of the difference between the reported results for flexural strength and the required design strength.
机译:在同一层压板上的拉伸和挠曲测试结果可能会有显着差异,报告的挠曲强度比使用标准ASTM报告方法的拉伸强度高100%。从表面上看,这些结果可能导致设计不保守。挠曲测试方法简单得多且成本更低,但是必须使用清楚地了解它们是如何计算的,并且必须具有合理的工程判断力,因为挠曲强度是根据线性弯曲理论计算的,通常是在非线性载荷下的破坏载荷下进行的。 。这是有意义的,因为公认的设计实践是在FRP设备的设计中使用线性理论。因此,报告此值的制造商应清楚了解所报告的抗弯强度结果与所需设计强度之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号