首页> 外文会议>International Teletraffic Congress(ITC20); 20070617-21; Ottawa(CA) >A Comparative Study of Forward Error Correction and Frame Accumulation for VoIP over Congested Networks
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Forward Error Correction and Frame Accumulation for VoIP over Congested Networks

机译:拥塞网络中VoIP的前向纠错和帧累积的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compare Forward Error Correction (FEC) and frame AC-Cumulation (ACC) to see which of the two schemes most effectively reduce frame loss rate for an aggregate of VoIP flows, sharing a network bottleneck. We model this bottleneck by a M/M/1/K queue and we analytically show that given certain assumptions, FEC is the best choice for low initial load at the bottleneck. Then, as the initial load increases, a crossing point is reached after which applying ACC is the better choice. We study this crossing point through numerical examples. Furthermore, we present numerical examples indicating that ACC is better than FEC in bandwidth limited network scenarios, while performance is more equal for packet processing limited scenarios, with FEC being the slightly better choice. Finally, we introduce more general queue models, e.g. the MMPP/M/1/K queue, to model traffic scenarios like the aggregate of ON/OFF VoIP traffic.
机译:我们比较了前向纠错(FEC)和帧AC累积(ACC),以查看这两种方案中哪一种最有效地降低了VoIP流总量的帧丢失率,从而共享了网络瓶颈。我们通过M / M / 1 / K队列对该瓶颈进行建模,并且分析表明,在某些假设的前提下,FEC是瓶颈处低初始负载的最佳选择。然后,随着初始载荷的增加,达到交叉点,在此之后施加ACC是更好的选择。我们通过数值示例研究此交叉点。此外,我们提供的数值示例表明,在带宽受限的网络场景中,ACC比FEC更好,而对于数据包处理受限的场景,性能则更为平等,而FEC则稍好一些。最后,我们介绍更多通用的队列模型,例如MMPP / M / 1 / K队列,以模拟流量情况,例如ON / OFF VoIP流量的总和。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号