【24h】

A Whether Forecast

机译:天气预报

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is a well-known fact that only factive propositional attitude predicates are felicitous with wh- (indirect question) complements. It has also been noted that so-called emotive factive predicates are only felicitous with some, not all, indirect question complements. But the reasons for these two constraints have remained unclear. I propose a competition-based explanation in terms of optimality theoretic pragmatics: Due to the competition with factive predicates, predicates like believe are infelicitous with complements automatically verifying the factive presupposition; and emotive factive predicates are infelicitous with wh-complements to the extent that these complements compete with more informative that complements. To arrive at these results, it is necessary to assume an analysis of questions on which they denote propositions and to be more careful than has been customary about the formulation of the presuppositions of factive and what I call super-factive predicates.
机译:众所周知的事实是,只有事实命题态度谓词才适合wh-(间接问题)补语。还应注意的是,所谓的情感性陈述谓词仅与一些而非全部的间接疑问句互补。但是,这两个限制的原因尚不清楚。我从最优性理论实用主义的角度提出了基于竞争的解释:由于与人为谓词的竞争,像信念这样的谓词不适合自动验证人为前提的补语。情感性的谓语谓语与wh补语是不恰当的,只要这些补语与更多的补语竞争。为了获得这些结果,有必要对它们表示命题的问题进行分析,并且要比以往习惯上对事实性前提和我所称的超构词性谓词的提法更为谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号