首页> 外文会议>International Nonwovens Technical Conference(INTC 2006); 20060925-28; Houston,TX(US) >REPRODUCIBILITY OF FILTER TEST STANDS ALSO ACCORDING TO STANDARDS
【24h】

REPRODUCIBILITY OF FILTER TEST STANDS ALSO ACCORDING TO STANDARDS

机译:过滤测试台的重现性也符合标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Depending upon application, the nonwoven aerosol separators are classified and/or compared according to different standards. Thereby, not only the respectively prescribed measuring methods are crucial, but also the test aerosols to be used according to the respective specification. The fractional separation efficiency forms usually the basis of the evaluation of a separator according to the above mentioned standards. The more accurately and more reliably is measured the particle quantity as a function of the particle size, the more reliably can be determined the fractional separation efficiency. For this, it is recommended to use so-called aerosol spectrometers which - depending upon the measuring method - measure optically or aerodynamically. In addition to the particle measuring technology, the use of the correct as well as constant and homogeneous test aerosol is also important for the testing of separators. Due to the different applications of the nonwoven filters different test aerosols are specified in the respective standards. Occasionally, for the each other corresponding standards on national and international level different test aerosols are prescribed for the same application - e.g. EN779 in Germany and ASHRAE in the USA for the testing of room air filters. The negative effect is test results which deviate from each other and which are therefore not directly comparable. Not only due to such differences it must be pointed out that it can be appropriate - depending upon objective - to test not according to standard but according to objective, e.g. at the new development or optimisation of a separator. In the years 1999 and 2004 round-robin tests were accomplished according to standard with different test stands. The results were disillusioning: Depending upon comparative measurement, there were result deviations of up to 73%. In the paper we will show that the fractional separation efficiency determination of filters can be accomplished on different test stands also in close tolerance.
机译:根据应用,根据不同的标准对非织造气雾分离器进行分类和/或比较。因此,不仅相应规定的测量方法是至关重要的,而且根据相应规范使用的测试气雾剂也是至关重要的。分级分离效率通常构成根据上述标准对分离器进行评估的基础。越精确,更可靠地测量作为颗粒大小函数的颗粒数量,就可以更可靠地确定分级分离效率。为此,建议使用所谓的气溶胶光谱仪,该气溶胶光谱仪根据测量方法以光学或空气动力学方式进行测量。除颗粒测量技术外,使用正确的,恒定的和均匀的测试气雾剂对分离器的测试也很重要。由于非织造过滤器的不同应用,相应的标准中指定了不同的测试气雾剂。有时,对于彼此对应的国家和国际级别的标准,为同一应用规定了不同的测试气雾剂-例如德国的EN779和美国的ASHRAE用于室内空气过滤器的测试。负面影响是测试结果相互偏离,因此不能直接比较。不仅由于这种差异,还必须指出,根据目标进行测试不是根据标准而是根据目标进行测试是适当的。在新开发或优化分隔符时。在1999年和2004年,根据标准使用不同的测试台完成了循环测试。结果令人失望:根据比较测量,结果偏差高达73%。在本文中,我们将表明,可以在不同的测试台上以紧密的公差完成过滤器分数分离效率的确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号