【24h】

WHAT FUKUSHIMA TAUGHT US ABOUT NUCLEAR POWER RISKS?

机译:关于核电风险,福岛对我们有什么看法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Nuclear power risks for the public were recognized as an important issue and are subject of several probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) starting with the WASH-1400 risk study performed in early 1970s. Nuclear safety goals were also formulated based on these studies and /or independently. Both the goals and the formulation of the risks considered the effects of radioactivity releases on the health of a population affected in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant undergoing an accident. WASH-1400 also considered the land contamination that a radioactive release may inflict. The Fukushima accident has highlighted that the principal consequences of a nuclear severe accident may not be the immediate fatalities and injuries and the latent (cancer) health effects, but the societal upheaval and the economic damage that could be caused by a major release of radioactivity to the environment. Such consequences of a severe nuclear accident bring a quite different focus to the risk profile of large-scale deployment of nuclear power in the world. This is addressed in this paper, along with the ancillary issues; design basis, residual risk, cost benefit and back-fit rules, GEN Ⅱ plants, GEN Ⅲ + plants, operator performance during severe accidents, fear of radioactivity, and finally public confidence in nuclear power.
机译:从1970年代初进行的WASH-1400风险研究开始,公众的核电风险被认为是一个重要问题,并且需要进行几项概率风险评估(PRA)。还基于这些研究和/或独立制定了核安全目标。目标和风险表述都考虑了放射性释放对在发生事故的核电厂附近受灾人口的健康的影响。 WASH-1400还考虑了放射性释放可能造成的土地污染。福岛事故凸显出,核严重事故的主要后果可能不是直接的死亡和伤害以及潜在的(癌症)健康影响,而是由于放射性物质大量释放造成的社会动荡和经济损失。环境。严重核事故的这种后果给世界上大规模部署核电的风险状况带来了完全不同的关注点。本文将解决此问题以及相关问题。设计依据,剩余风险,成本收益和后装规则,GENⅡ工厂,GENⅢ+工厂,严重事故中的操作员表现,对放射性的恐惧以及最终公众对核电的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号