Integrating Responsible Care, Community Advisory Panels, and Local Emergency Planning Committees into Successful RMP Communications to the Public

机译：将责任关怀，社区咨询小组和地方应急计划委员会整合到成功的RMP与公众沟通中

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

To begin with, let's review three important facets of communicating with the public-Responsible Care, Community Advisory Panels, and Local Emergency Planning Committees.

机译：首先，让我们回顾与公众责任关怀，社区咨询小组和地方应急计划委员会进行沟通的三个重要方面。

著录项

来源
《International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials September 28-October 1, 1999 San Francisco, California》|1999年|p.649-661|共13页
会议地点 San Francisco CA(US)
作者
Nick Macchiarolo;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类环境污染及其防治;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-26 13:57:38

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Recommendations for implementation of community consultation and public disclosure under the Food and Drug Administration's "Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research": a special report from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. [J] . Halperin H, Paradis N, Mosesso-V Jr, Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2007,第16期

机译：根据食品和药物管理局的“紧急研究的知情同意要求的例外情况”实施社区咨询和公开披露的建议：美国心脏协会紧急心血管护理委员会和心肺，围手术期和重症监护委员会的特别报告：得到以下机构的认可美国急诊医师学院和急诊医学学会。
2. Community advisory committees: drivers of consumer, carer, and community participation in Victoria's public health services. [J] . Mack L The Journal of ambulatory care management . 2010,第3期

机译：社区咨询委员会：消费者，护理人员和社区参与维多利亚州公共卫生服务的驱动力。
3. Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest: An Advisory Statement by the Advanced Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation (vol 132, pg 2448, 2015) [J] . Donnino Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association . 2016,第1期

机译：心脏骤停后的温度管理：国际复苏委员会高级生命支持工作组和美国心脏协会紧急心血管护理委员会以及心肺，重症监护，围手术期和复苏委员会的咨询声明（第132卷，第2448页），2015）
4. Integrating Responsible Care, Community Advisory Panels, and Local Emergency Planning Committees into Successful RMP Communications to the Public [C] . Nick Macchiarolo International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials . 1999

机译：将负责任的护理，社区咨询小组和当地应急计划委员会整合到公众的成功RMP沟通
5. Local emergency planning committees: Collaboration, risk communication, information technology and homeland security. [D] . Blackwood, Matthew Joseph. 2003

机译：地方应急计划委员会：协作，风险沟通，信息技术和国土安全。
6. Planning primary care. Towards even better primary care. A discussion document from: the Regional Primary Care Medical Advisory Committee of the South Western Region and the South Western Regional Health Authority. [O] . D. P. Gray 1992

机译：规划初级保健。争取更好的初级保健。讨论文件来自：西南地区区域初级保健医疗咨询委员会和西南地区卫生局。
7. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines) 11This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in September 2002, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2002, and the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology in August 2002.22The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur. The conflict of interest information for the writing committee members is posted on the ACC, AHA, and NASPE Web sites with the full-length version of the update.33When citing this document, the ACC, the AHA, and NASPE would appreciate the following citation format: Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, Winters SL. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol2002;40:1703–19.44Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699 (ask for No. 71-0237). To obtain a copy of the Summary Article, ask for reprint No. 71-0236. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.55(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703–19.)66©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gregoratos Gabriel, Abrams Jonathan, Epstein Andrew E, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会将更新1998年起搏器指南） 11该文件于2002年9月获得美国心脏病学会基金会董事会的批准，于2002年8月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准，并于2002年8月获得北美起搏和电生理学会的批准。22ACC / AHA工作组《实践指南》将尽一切努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审核，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。撰写委员会成员的利益冲突信息已发布在更新的完整版本的ACC，AHA和NASPE网站上。33当引用本文档时，ACC，AHA和NASPE将不胜感激。格式：Gregoratos G，Abrams J，Epstein AE，Freedman RA，Hayes DL，Hlatky MA，Kerber RE，Naccarelli GV，Schoenfeld MH，Silka MJ，Winters SL。 ACC / AHA / NASPE 2002心脏起搏器和抗心律失常装置植入指南更新-总结文章：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（ACC / AHA / NASPE委员会更新了1998年起搏器指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol2002； 40：1703–19.44复制：此文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。您可以致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，获得一份完整的指南（请致电71-0237））。要获得摘要文章的副本，请索要第71-0236号转载。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或发送电子邮件至kbradle@lww.com.55（J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1703–19。）66©2002美国心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司

Integrating Responsible Care, Community Advisory Panels, and Local Emergency Planning Committees into Successful RMP Communications to the Public

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅