【24h】

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF OCEANIC AND GEOLOGICAL CO_2 DISPOSAL

机译:海洋和地质CO_2处置的公众看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We conducted a two-part study to explore public perceptions of oceanic and geological CO_2 disposal. Both phases of the study used a modified version of the mental model method for risk perception and communication developed at Carnegie Mellon. The first phase of the study was conducted to explore people's beliefs about carbon capture and disposal. A modified mental models interview methodology, in which we iteratively supplied information and elicited reactions, was used to conduct face-to-face interviews with 18 lay respondents. While the interviews yielded a slightly positive overall reaction to carbon disposal, they also identified concerns, especially about oceanic disposal. Furthermore, the results suggested that the general public is interested in considering a greater range of energy system options, such as wind and solar generated power, for the control of atmospheric greenhouse gas than was presented in the materials of this first study. The second phase of the study built on the results of the first study using a non-interactive paper survey administered to 126 respondents. The design of the survey was shaped by the language and ideas used by respondents in the interview-based study. The survey presented information in greater detail about CO_2 disposal, and elicited responses in areas potentially related to the acceptance of the technology. Acceptance of CO_2 disposal methodologies was measured separately for oceanic and geological disposal, using two methods. Respondents rated their level of approval of each type of disposal, and ranked the disposal options along with seven other options to reduce CO_2 emissions from electricity use. Respondents preferred all other options, including nuclear power, over CO_2 disposal technologies, and showed a small preference for geological over oceanic disposal. The provision of information about CO_2 disposal technologies had only modest effects, showing decreased ratings for geological and oceanic disposal, with a stronger decrease for the latter.
机译:我们进行了一个分为两部分的研究,以探索公众对海洋和地质CO_2处置的认识。研究的两个阶段都使用了卡内基梅隆大学开发的心理模型方法的改进版本,用于风险感知和沟通。研究的第一阶段是为了探索人们对碳捕获和处置的信念。一种经过修改的心理模型访谈方法,在该方法中,我们迭代地提供了信息并引起了反应,该方法被用来与18名外行受访者进行面对面的访谈。访谈虽然对碳排放产生了总体积极的反应,但他们也发现了一些担忧,尤其是对海洋处置的担忧。此外,结果表明,与本研究的材料相比,公众有兴趣考虑更多的能源系统选择方案,例如风能和太阳能,以控制大气中的温室气体。该研究的第二阶段建立在第一项研究结果的基础上,该研究使用了针对126名受访者的非交互式纸质调查。该调查的设计受到受访者在基于访谈的研究中使用的语言和想法的影响。该调查更详细地介绍了有关CO_2处理的信息,并在可能与该技术的接受有关的领域引起了回应。使用两种方法分别测量了海洋和地质处置的CO_2处置方法的可接受性。受访者对每种处置方式的认可程度进行了评估,并对处置方式以及其他七个减少用电产生的CO_2排放的方式进行了排名。与CO_2处置技术相比,受访者更喜欢包括核电在内的所有其他选择,并且相对于海洋处置,地质调查显示偏少。提供有关CO_2处置技术的信息仅产生了适度的影响,显示出地质和海洋处置的等级下降,而后者的下降幅度更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号