首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies; 20040905-09; Vancouver(CA) >CHASING THE DRAGON'S TAIL; LIFE CYCLE CARBON ANALYSIS APPLIED TO CO_2 SEQUESTRATION
【24h】

CHASING THE DRAGON'S TAIL; LIFE CYCLE CARBON ANALYSIS APPLIED TO CO_2 SEQUESTRATION

机译:追逐龙的尾巴;生命周期碳分析在CO_2分离中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A huge variety of methods have been proposed for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, ranging from energy-efficiency measures for emissions avoidance, to the sequestration of combustion-derived CO_2 in deep oceans or spent oilfields. We have investigated the use of various tools for comparing the effectiveness of different methods, illustrated by examples in this paper. Of these, the technique of Life Cycle Carbon Analysis (LCCA) should be developed as an effective tool for the comparison of options for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, for the introduction of energy-efficient processes, and for the utilisation of renewables in power generation or liquid fuel production. Comparisons may be made in terms of carbon payback time per tonne of 'carbon' invested; or of the lifetime cost per tonne of CO_2 foregone or sequestered. Examples are given of coal-fired power generation with CO_2 removal and sequestration, domestic energy-saving equipment and small-scale renewable energy installations. These enable some generic conclusions to be drawn about the current state of technologies for ghg reduction/sequestration; and also lead to target costings per tonne of CO_2 equivalent avoided. These costings indicate that, with current technology, investments in the containment of HFCs, in CH_4 leakage reduction, and in straightforward measures for energy efficiency and energy conservation, are all far more cost-effective than CO_2 capture technologies. In particular, cost-effective and carbon-effective reductions in emissions of non-CO_2 ghgs are far more readily achievable than CO_2 reduction measures, both economically and in engineering terms. LCCA demonstrates that policies that address the impact of these releases will show the most immediate and tangible benefits.
机译:已经提出了各种各样的减少温室气体排放的方法,从避免排放的节能措施到隔离深海或废油田中燃烧产生的CO_2。我们已经研究了使用各种工具来比较不同方法的有效性,如本文中的示例所示。其中,应开发生命周期碳分析(LCCA)技术,作为比较减少温室气体排放,采用节能流程和利用电力中可再生能源的各种选择的有效工具。发电或液体燃料生产。可以根据每吨“碳”的碳回收时间进行比较。或已封存或每吨CO_2的生命周期成本。例子有燃煤发电和二氧化碳的去除与封存,家用节能设备以及小型可再生能源装置。这些使我们可以得出关于减少/隔离GHG技术的当前状态的一些一般性结论;并避免了每吨CO_2当量的目标成本。这些成本表明,在当前技术下,对氢氟碳化合物的遏制,CH_4泄漏减少的投资以及针对节能和节能的直接措施的投资,都比CO_2捕集技术更具成本效益。特别是,无论从经济角度还是从工程角度来讲,与CO_2减排措施相比,非CO_2 ghgs排放的成本效益和碳效益减排都更加容易实现。 LCCA证明,解决这些发行版影响的策略将显示最直接,最明显的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号