【24h】

An Alternative Chinese Keyboard Layout Design for Single-Digit Typists

机译:单位数字打字员的另一种中文键盘布局设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study designed an alternative Chinese keyboard layout for single-digit typists and evaluated the efficacy of this innovative layout design. The new eight row by five column keyboard layout was designed based on the principles of alternative keyboard design. Eight college students with proficient keyboarding were involved in this study. The repeated measurement experimental design was used to compare the speed and accuracy of keystroke among the four different keyboard patterns: QWERTY, Alternative, Revised-QWERTY, and Random-Alternative. The experimental results indicated that the subjects' typing speed is fastest when utilizing the QWERTY layout (63.86 symbols/minute), followed by the Alternative (56.02 symbols/minute), Revised QWERTY (53.39 symbols/minute) and the Random-Alternative keyboard (49.94 symbols/minute). There is no significant difference among QWERTY, Alternative, Revised-QWERTY, and Random-Alternative layouts on the subjects' typing accuracy. The possible causes of the unpredicted results and suggestions for further studies were discussed.
机译:这项研究为一位数字打字员设计了另一种中文键盘布局,并评估了这种创新的布局设计的功效。新的八行五列键盘布局是根据替代键盘设计原理设计的。八名熟练的键盘专业大学生参与了这项研究。重复测量实验设计用于比较四种不同键盘模式(QWERTY,Alternative,Revended-QWERTY和Random-Alternative)的击键速度和准确性。实验结果表明,使用QWERTY布局(63.86个符号/分钟)时,受试者的键入速度最快,其次是“替代”(56.02个符号/分钟),修订的QWERTY(53.39个符号/分钟)和随机替代键盘( 49.94个符号/分钟)。在主题的键入准确性上,QWERTY,Alternative,Revended-QWERTY和Random-Alternative布局之间没有显着差异。讨论了产生意外结果的可能原因,并提出了进一步研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号