首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Abstracts >THE DIALECTICAL THINKING ABOUT DETERMINISTIC ANDPROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS
【24h】

THE DIALECTICAL THINKING ABOUT DETERMINISTIC ANDPROBABILISTIC SAFETY ANALYSIS

机译:关于确定性和概率安全性分析的辩证法

获取原文

摘要

There are two methods in designing andanalysing the safety performance of a nuclear powerplant, the traditional deterministic method and theprobabilistic method. To date, the design of nuclearpower plant is based on the deterministic method. Ithas been proved in practice that the deterministicmethod is effective on current nuclear power plant.However, the probabilistic method (ProbabilisticSafety Assessment - PSA) considers a much widerrange of faults, takes an integrated look at the plant asa whole, and uses realistic criteria for theperformance of the systems and constructions of theplant. PSA can be seen, in principle, to provide a broader and realistic perspective on safety issues thanthe deterministic approaches.In this paper, the historical origins anddevelopment trend of above two methods arereviewed and summarized in brief. Based on thediscussion of two application cases - one is thechanges to specific design provisions of the generaldesign criteria (GDC) and the other is therisk-informed categorization of structure, system andcomponent, it can be concluded that the deterministicmethod and probabilistic method are dialectical andunified, and that they are being merged into eachother gradually, and being used in coordination.
机译:设计和分析核电厂安全性能的方法有两种,传统的确定性方法和概率性方法。迄今为止,核电厂的设计是基于确定性方法的。实践证明,确定性方法对当前的核电厂是有效的。然而,概率方法(概率安全评估-PSA)考虑了范围更广的故障,对整个电厂进行了综合研究,并使用了实际的性能标准。植物的系统和结构从原理上讲,PSA可以提供比确定性方法更广阔,更现实的观点。本文对上述两种方法的历史渊源和发展趋势进行了简要回顾和总结。基于两个应用案例的讨论-一个是对通用设计标准(GDC)的特定设计规定的更改,另一个是结构,系统和组件的风险告知分类,可以得出结论,确定性方法和概率方法是辩证的且统一的,并逐渐将它们融合在一起,并进行协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号