首页> 外文会议>Institution of chemical engineers symposium on hazards >RISKS TO PROCESS SAFETY IN A CONTRACTED OUT ENVIRONMENT (CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY)
【24h】

RISKS TO PROCESS SAFETY IN A CONTRACTED OUT ENVIRONMENT (CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY)

机译:在外包环境中进行过程安全的风险(承包商,顾问和企业责任)

获取原文

摘要

Over the last 25 years we have seen the demise of large chemical and manufacturing companies into smaller business units by a series of sales, floatations, divestments, management buyouts etc. With the division of previously large companies into multiple small autonomous units, there has been a reduction in the number of companies who retain significant safety or engineering capability in-house. This has led to a much greater reliance on the use of Consultants and Contractors for the provision of primary safety, technical and design support. It also appears that there is a limited number of consultants who are capable of providing a high level of safety knowledge.It ts dear that there are a number of risks involved in the extensive contracting out of core responsibilities to external companies and third parties. These risks are:• Lack of responsibility of the consultant in ensuring that safety recommendations are feasible within the operating environment• Lack of understanding of the key recommendations made by the consultant• Failure of the company to recognise the importance of the recommendations made by the consultant• Failure of the company to correctly specify the contract and delivery of the problem• Lack of resources to implement consultant recommendations or recommendations are unreasonable• Failure of the consultant to deliver an engineered solution in the hope of obtaining further workThis paper considers the use and relationship between operating companies, contractors and consultants and the issues for sustainability and corporate responsibility within a highly regulated (COMAH) environment. In particular, the risks and responsibilities of using external personnel on important projects and the ability to retain corporate knowledge and the responsibility for decision making are considered. Also, considered is the choice of contractor/ consultant and how we ensure competency in a rapidly changing industrial climate.Generally, an independent consultant provides management advice or recommendations, typically in the form of a report, whether written or verbal. The client does not have control over the result of the service or the manner of performance for the task.For the company, how do we ensure that key knowledge is retained within the organisation and indeed, what is the minimum level of knowledge that is needed in-house to retain the ability to be able to properly select an external organisation to provide specialist assistance. In particular, how do companies ensure an adequate level of Risk Management for the hazards found on the site within a contracted-out environment.The question is posed as to what level of contracting out is viable and sustainable.This paper is not a condemnation of contractors and consultants and nor should it be taken as one. Indeed, without the work carried out by these people, industry could not function as efficiently as it currently does. This paper is simply an examination of the potential risks that occur due to over-reliance on external resources.
机译:在过去的25年中,我们看到大型化学和制造公司通过一系列的销售,浮动,撤资,管理层收购等方式消亡为较小的业务部门。随着以前的大型公司被划分为多个小型自主单位,减少了保留内部重要安全或工程能力的公司数量。这导致在提供主要安全,技术和设计支持方面更加依赖顾问和承包商的使用。看来,能够提供高水平安全知识的顾问数量有限,亲爱的是,将核心职责广泛外包给外部公司和第三方涉及很多风险。这些风险包括:•缺乏确保在操作环境中可行的安全建议的顾问责任•缺乏对顾问提出的主要建议的理解•公司未能意识到顾问提出的建议的重要性•公司未能正确指定合同并解决问题;•缺乏实施顾问建议或建议的资源;•顾问未能交付工程解决方案以希望获得进一步的工作。本文考虑了这种用法和关系运营公司,承包商和顾问之间的关系,以及在高度管制(COMAH)环境中的可持续性和企业责任问题。尤其要考虑在重要项目上使用外部人员的风险和责任,以及保留公司知识的能力和决策责任。此外,还应考虑选择承包商/顾问以及我们如何确保在瞬息万变的工业环境中的能力。通常,独立顾问以书面或口头报告的形式提供管理建议或建议。客户无法控制服务的结果或任务的执行方式。对于公司,我们如何确保关键知识保留在组织内,实际上,最低知识是什么?内部保留适当选择外部组织以提供专家帮助的能力。特别是,公司如何确保在外包环境中对现场发现的危害进行适当的风险管理。问题是,什么级别的外包是可行和可持续的。本文并不谴责承包商和顾问,也不应被视为一体。的确,如果没有这些人的工作,工业将无法像现在这样高效地运转。本文仅是对由于过度依赖外部资源而发生的潜在风险的研究。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Manchester(GB)
  • 作者

    Tony Ennis;

  • 作者单位

    Haztech Consultants Ltd Meridian House Business Centre Road One Winsford Industrial Estate Winsford Cheshire CW7 3QG UK;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号