首页> 外文会议>Innovation and Development of Urban Agricultural Engineering I >Evaluation of Spatial Variability and Mapping of Soil Properties in Precision Agriculture
【24h】

Evaluation of Spatial Variability and Mapping of Soil Properties in Precision Agriculture

机译:精准农业空间变异性评价与土壤特性图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is important to understand the spatial variability of soil properties and to choose an optimal interpolation technique for mapping soil properties in precision agriculture. The objectives of this paper were: a) to evaluate spatial variability of soil properties within a field using geostatistical analysis, b) to compare the interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. This research was conducted in a wheat field of the trail farm in Shunyi county, Beijing. With an AgGPS 132, seventy-two soil samples were obtained within 40m regular intervals of a grid. The soil properties tested were N, P, and K. The results suggested that the spatial variability of P were more obvious than N and K, the random sampling error of N was bigger than P and K, and the range of K was larger than N and P. The techniques of Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) can significantly improve estimation precision compared with Spline technique. Comparison of Kriging and IDW estimations revealed that Kriging performed better than IDW. Furthermore, Kriging is the best with spherical or exponential model, and IDW is the best with the exponent values of 2.
机译:重要的是要了解土壤特性的空间变异性,并选择最佳插值技术来绘制精确农业中的土壤特性。本文的目的是:a)使用地统计分析来评估田间土壤特性的空间变异性,b)比较用于绘制土壤特性的插值方法。这项研究是在北京顺义县的小农场的麦田上进行的。使用AgGPS 132,在40m规则网格间隔内获得了72个土壤样品。试验的土壤特性为N,P和K。结果表明,P的空间变异性比N和K更明显,N的随机采样误差大于P和K,K的范围大于N和P。与样条线技术相比,克里格和逆距离加权(IDW)技术可以显着提高估计精度。克里格和IDW估计的比较表明,克里格比IDW表现更好。此外,在球面或指数模型中,克里金法最佳,而指数值为2时,IDW则最佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号