首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations;ITNG '09 >Comparison of QOS Fixed and Limited Interleaved Polling with Cyclic Demand Proportionality Algorithms
【24h】

Comparison of QOS Fixed and Limited Interleaved Polling with Cyclic Demand Proportionality Algorithms

机译:QOS固定和受限交错轮询与循环需求比例算法的比较

获取原文

摘要

Ethernet passive optical network (EPON) is an access network that delivers essential services of voice, video, and data communications reliably, while at the same time providing expected guarantees of the delivery of those services in terms of defined quality of service measures (QOS). This paper compares performance criteria such as delay, queue size, and packet loss ratio for two dynamic bandwidth allocation (DBA) algorithms: interleaved polling with adaptive cycle time (IPACT), and a new cyclic demand proportionality algorithm (CDP). CDP gives the best performances in terms delay vs. offered load, queue size vs. offered load and packet loss ratio vs. offered load compared to IPACT with the fixed allocation window size for transmission. Improvement is seen for these three parameters when CDP is compared with IPACT with limited allocation window size. A traffic generator that gives traffic with self-similar and long range dependency properties is used in the simulations.
机译:以太网无源光网络(EPON)是一种接入网络,可可靠地提供语音,视频和数据通信的基本服务,同时根据已定义的服务质量度量(QOS)为这些服务的交付提供预期的保证。本文比较了两种动态带宽分配(DBA)算法的性能标准,例如延迟,队列大小和丢包率:带自适应循环时间的交错轮询(IPACT)和新的循环需求比例算法(CDP)。与IPACT相比,在固定传输窗口大小的情况下,CDP在延迟与所提供的负载,队列大小与所提供的负载以及丢包率与所提供的负载之间提供了最佳性能。当CDP与IPACT在有限分配窗口大小下进行比较时,这三个参数得到了改善。在仿真中使用了流量生成器,该生成器为流量提供了自相似且具有长距离依赖性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号